IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 13 March 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018512 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that he be awarded the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states that he was wounded while assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment in Vietnam in January 1968 with second degree burns to his right arm and side by napalm. He further states that he was evacuated to a hospital in Da Nang. 3. The applicant provides no additional documents with his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army in St. Louis, Missouri on 10 January 1967 for a period of 2 years. He completed his basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, Missouri and his advanced individual training as a light weapons infantryman at Fort Polk, Louisiana before being transferred to Vietnam on 15 August 1967. 3. He was assigned to Company C, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division and was advanced to the pay grade of E-3 on 19 August 1967. 4. He departed Vietnam, on 14 August 1968, and was transferred to Oakland Army Base, California where he was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) as an overseas returnee, on 18 August 1968. He had served 1 year and 7 months of active service and his DD Form 214 issued at the time of his REFRAD shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Vietnam, Campaign Medal, Army Commendation Medal, and Combat Infantryman Badge. 5. A review of his official records failed to show any evidence of the applicant being wounded while in Vietnam. Additionally, his name is not contained on the Vietnam Casualty Listing. 6. Additionally, a search of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal orders awarding the applicant the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was wounded in Vietnam is not in doubt he has failed to provide sufficient evidence to support his contention. 2. To award the Purple Heart there must be substantiating evidence to verify that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Absent such evidence there appears to be no basis to award him the Purple Heart at this time. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x___ ____x___ ____x___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms. _______ _ __x_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018512 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018512 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1