IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110018848 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, reconsideration of his earlier request for restoration of his rank/grade to sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7, the highest rank/grade in which he satisfactorily served in the Army National Guard (ARNG). 2. The applicant states he was reduced to staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 for inefficiency on 31 July 1998 after 16 years of time in grade as an SFC. He has waited the required 30 years to apply for correction. 3. The applicant provides: * Orders 41-1, issued by Headquarters, 29th Infantry Brigade, Hawaii Army National Guard (HIARNG), Honolulu, HI, dated 25 August 1982 * Orders 19-01, issued by the same headquarters, dated 4 August 1998 * his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 30 September 1999 * his letter to the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Support Division-St Louis, subject: The Army Grade Determination Review Board (AGDRB), dated 8 November 2003 * a letter to him from ARBA, Arlington, VA, dated 19 February 2004 * his letter to ARBA, subject: The AGDRB, dated 5 September 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110004443 on 15 September 2011. 2. The applicant provides new evidence in the form of correspondence between himself and ARBA which warrants consideration by the Board. 3. The applicant enlisted in the HIARNG on 25 May 1970. He successfully completed training and he held military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). He subsequently served through a series of reenlistments or extensions, performing duties in various positions until his retirement. The highest rank/grade he attained while serving in the HIARNG was SFC/E-7 with a date of rank of August 1982. 4. On 5 May 1998, the applicant received notification that the Qualitative Retention Board had recommended his retention in the ARNG for one additional year. It stated the applicant needed to complete his missing Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reporting System (NCOERS) reports for 1997 and that he needed to take and pass an Army Physical Fitness Test (APFT). The notification further stated the applicant’s last APFT was taken October 1996. 5. A review of his NCOER for the period April 1997 through March 1998 shows he received: * "Excellent" ratings in Part IVb,d-f (Competence, Leadership, Training, Responsibility and Accountability) from his Rater * An "Among the Best" rating in Part Va (Overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility) from his Rater * The highest ratings in Parts Vc (Overall performance) and Vd (Overall potential for promotion and/or service in positions of greater responsibility) from his Senior Rater 6. However, Part IVc (Physical Fitness and Military Bearing) of this NCOER shows he received a “Needs Improvement (Some)” rating from his Rater. The APFT block of this part shows the entry “9712/fail.” 7. Orders 19-01, dated 4 August 1998, reduced the applicant from SFC/E-7 to SSG/E-6, effective 11 July 1998 by reason of inefficiency. 8. Orders 067-001, dated 7 April 1999, discharged the applicant from the ARNG in the rank/grade of SSG/E-6 and transferred him to the Retired Reserve. 9. As new evidence, the applicant provides copies of: a. an 8 November 2003, letter to the ARBA Support Division, St Louis, requesting to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade that he satisfactorily held while on active duty. b. a 19 February 2004, ARBA letter informing the applicant he should have filed his request to the Commanding Officer, U.S. Total Army Human Resources Command - St Louis, ATTN: ARPC-PSP-T, 1 Reserve Way, St Louis, MO 63132-5100. c. a 5 September 2011, letter to ARBA, again requesting to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade he satisfactorily held while on active duty. 10. Army Regulation 135-180 (Qualifying Service for Retired Pay Nonregular Service) states, in pertinent part, that a person granted retired pay will receive such pay in the highest grade (temporary or permanent) satisfactorily held by him/her during his/her entire period of service. Service in the highest grade will not be deemed satisfactory if it is determined that any of the following factors exist: a. reduction to a lower grade was expressly for prejudice or cause, due to misconduct, or punishment pursuant to Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice, or court-martial; or b. there is information in the Soldier’s service record to indicate clearly that the highest grade was not served satisfactorily. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence shows that in a 19 February 2004 letter from ARBA to the applicant he was informed that the appropriate office to handle his issue was the Commanding Officer, U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St Louis. However, there is no evidence he applied to that office and that his request was denied. 2. Nevertheless, the applicant's reduction to SSG/E-6 was expressly for cause and under the provisions of the governing regulation the applicant's service in pay grade E-7 was not satisfactory. 3. His new evidence was considered; however, it is insufficient to merit granting of the applicant's request. 4. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ _______ _________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ___ X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis to amend the decision of the ABCMR set forth in Docket Number AR20110004443, dated 15 September 2011. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110010831 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110018848 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1