IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020596 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. 2. The applicant states he served honorably at every unit he was assigned to throughout his 3 years of active service. He further states he was assigned to the 18th Surgical Hospital during a period the unit received the Meritorious Unit Commendation. 3. The applicant provides: * his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) * an extract of Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 November 1968 for a period of 3 years. He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 91C (Clinical Specialist). The highest rank/grade he attained during his period of service was specialist five (SP5)/E-5. 3. His DA Form 20 shows that: a. during his service in Vietnam he was assigned to the: * 27th Surgical Hospital from 12 November 1970 through 19 May 1971 * 18th Surgical Hospital from 20 May through 31 July 1971 * 91st Evacuation Hospital from 1 August to 2 November 1971 b. he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. 4. His record does not contain any derogatory or disciplinary actions or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from receiving the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. 5. On 2 November 1971, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation. His DD Form 214 shows award of the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) * one overseas service bar 6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following two campaigns: * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971) * Consolidation I (1 July - 30 November 1971) 8. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows the 18th Surgical Hospital was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation for the period 1 January 1970 through 31 January 1971 by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 43, dated 1972. 9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3, paragraph 6d states that Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units, during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. 10. Army Regulation 670-1 (Uniforms and Insignia) governs the requirements for the Overseas Service Bar. It states a bar is authorized for wear for each period of active Federal service as a member of the U.S. Army outside of the continental limits of the United States for the specific time frames and areas of operation cited in Army Regulation 670-1 or appropriate Department of the Army message. There are special provisions regarding authorization for the Overseas Service Bar for service in a hostile fire zone and for combining service to calculate award of the bars. For Vietnam service, one overseas service bar was authorized for each period of 6 months active Federal service as a member of a U.S. Service in Vietnam from 1 July 1958 to 28 March 1973. Both the month of arrival and the month of departure from Vietnam were counted as whole months for credit toward the overseas service bar. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant served honorably during the period 21 November 1968 through 2 November 1971. He served in Vietnam, attained the rank/grade of SP5/E-5, and he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service. His record contains no information that would have disqualified him for the Army Good Conduct Medal; therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award the applicant the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. 2. Records show the applicant participated in two campaign phases during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show these bronze service stars. 3. One of the applicant's units in Vietnam was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation during his period of assignment. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 4. All units in Vietnam were awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 5. The applicant served during a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for two overseas service bars. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly. 6. In view of the foregoing, his DD Form 214 should be corrected as recommended below. BOARD VOTE: ____x___ ____x___ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and one overseas service bar; b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 21 November 1968 through 2 November 1971; and c. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Meritorious Unit Commendation * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * two overseas service bars ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020596 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020596 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1