IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 5 April 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110020620 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his general discharge (GD) be upgraded to an honorable discharge (HD) as a matter of clemency. 2. The applicant states he was originally being separated for being overweight which would have resulted in an HD. However, while this paperwork was being processed his commander was notified he was 3 months behind on loan payments which resulted in his commander changing his discharge to misconduct. He states regardless of the reason he was discharged, he just wanted to explain the reasons for the discharge and request clemency. 3. The applicant provides a self-authored statement, college transcripts, and class completion certificates in support of the application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 March 1994, and he was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 71L (Administrative Specialist). His record shows he was advanced to the rank of specialist/E-4 on 1 October 1995 and this is the highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty. His record documents no acts of valor or significant achievement. 2. The facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant’s separation processing are not in the record. The record does contain a properly-constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) that identifies the authority and reason for the applicant’s discharge. 3. The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 18 October 1999, the date of his discharge, shows he completed 5 years, 7 months, and 3 days of creditable active military service. It also shows he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c (Commission of a Serious Offense), Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of “Misconduct” and that he received a GD. 4. On 27 May 2011, the Army Discharge Review Board, after reviewing the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his discharge, his military records, and all other available evidence, determined the applicant’s discharge was proper and equitable and voted unanimously not to change the character and reason for his discharge. 5. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the policies, standards, and procedures for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating personnel for misconduct because of minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, conviction by civil authorities, desertion, and absence without leave. 6. Paragraph 14-3 of Army Regulation 635-200 contains guidance on characterization of service for members separated under chapter 14. It states that a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. The separation authority may direct a GD if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record. It further states a characterization of honorable is not authorized unless the Soldier's record is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization clearly would be inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s request to upgrade his GD to an HD as a matter of clemency has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. 2. The applicant's separation was accomplished in accordance with the applicable regulation. All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process. 3. By regulation, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a member separated by reason of misconduct. Clearly, the length and honorable nature of the applicant's overall record of service was the basis for receiving a GD instead of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. It is equally clear the applicant's record of misconduct diminished his overall record of service below that meriting a fully HD. Although the applicant’s post-service accomplishments are noteworthy, absent any evidence of error or injustice in the discharge process, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support an upgrade of his discharge as a matter of clemency in this case. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X ___ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020620 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110020620 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1