IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021366 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests the Valorous Unit Award (VUA), Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 2. The applicant states: * The VUA, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation were awarded after he left the unit and were never added to his DD Form 214 * The PUC was awarded on 8 July 2011 in Hawaii 3. The applicant provides: * Two pages of Company A, 1st Battalion, 27th Infantry lineage and honors * DD Form 214 * Documentation pertaining to a PUC presentation ceremony on 8 July 2011 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 September 1965. He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to Company A, 1st Battalion, 27th Infantry in Vietnam from 21 February 1966 to 8 February 1967. On 20 September 1967, he was released from active duty in the temporary rank of specialist four after completing 2 years of creditable active service with no lost time. 3. His DD Form 214 shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Purple Heart * Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device * Combat Infantryman Badge 4. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This pamphlet shows the 1st Battalion, 27th Infantry, was cited for award of the: * VUA by Department of the Army General Orders (DAGO) Number 20, dated 1967 * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation by DAGO Number 48, dated 1971 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation by DAGO 51, dated 1971 5. Permanent orders, dated 1 September 2010, show Company A, 1st Battalion, 27th Infantry was awarded the PUC for extraordinary heroism on 19 July 1966 in Vietnam. 6. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence he was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service. 7. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. His Vietnam unit was cited for award of the VUA, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation during his period of assignment. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. 2. Permanent orders show the applicant's unit was awarded the PUC on 1 September 2010. His DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit citation. 3. He was released from active duty in the temporary rank of specialist four with 2 years of creditable active service with no lost time. His records also show he received "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his service with no disciplinary action or a commander's disqualification. It appears he met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 September 1965 through 20 September 1967 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. BOARD VOTE: ____X __ ____X___ ___X____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 21 September 1965 through 20 September 1967; and b. adding the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award), VUA, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, and PUC to his DD Form 214. ___________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021366 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021366 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1