BOARD DATE: 8 May 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110021395 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 2. The applicant states: * He served in Vietnam with the 18th Surgical Hospital from November 1967 to November 1968 * The Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was issued to all members who served with the 18th Surgical Hospital from 1965 to 1969 3. The applicant provides: * A document showing honors for the 18th Surgical Hospital * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 22 June 1966 for a period of 3 years. He served as an operating room specialist assigned to the 18th Surgical Hospital in Vietnam from 20 November 1967 to 12 November 1968. On 21 June 1969, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Reinforcement) to complete his remaining service obligation. 3. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal 4. General Orders Number 78, issued by Letterman General Hospital, dated 30 March 1968, awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 22 June 1966 through 21 June 1969. 5. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) was published to assist commanders and personnel officers in determining or establishing the eligibility of Soldiers for campaign participation credit, assault landing credit, and unit citation badges awarded during the Vietnam Conflict. Paragraph 6d states that Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units, during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. 6. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-13, contains the regulatory guidance on the Vietnam Service Medal. It states that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. A silver service star will be worn in lieu of five bronze service stars. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, the applicant participated in the following five campaigns: * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase III (1 June 1967 - 29 January 1968) * Tet Counteroffensive (30 January - 1 April 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase IV (2 April - 30 June 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase V (1 July - 1 November 1968) * Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VI (2 November 1968 - 22 February 1969) DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. All units in Vietnam were cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross during the applicant's service in Vietnam. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 2. General orders awarded him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award). Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. 3. He participated in five campaigns during his service in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to one silver service star for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show this silver service star. BOARD VOTE: __x__ ____x____ ___x_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal, and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with one silver service star * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation ________x_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021395 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110021395 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1