Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2011/09/15 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that when he was discharged, he was a misguided young man still trying to find his way in the world. He is older now and has more responsibilities in his life. He is the father of two wonderful kids, and they are the reason for his existence. He wants to go back to school to further advance himself in his career path so that he is able to better provide for his family. The only way he will be able to afford his education is with the help of the GI Bill, and a "general under honorable conditions" discharge makes him ineligible for that help. Please help a former Soldier who is trying to help himself. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 020904 Discharge Received: Date: 021015 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: HHC, 4th Corps Material Management Center, Fort Hood, Texas Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 010604, failure to be at the appointed place of duty (010508); seven days extra duty (Summarized). 010919, wrongful use of marijuana (THC) a controlled substance; reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $521.40 for one month (suspended until 011101); 45 days extra duty (FG). 020307, willfully disobeyed a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer (011218); forfeiture of $257.00; 14 days restriction; 14 days extra duty (CG). Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 18 Current ENL Date: 000608 Current ENL Term: 03 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 08 Days ????? Total Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 08 Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 92Y10/Unit Supply Specialist GT: 114 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: ????? Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant. VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 4 September 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for receiving a FG Article 15 for wrongful use a of controlled substances, a CG Article 15 for dereliction of duties and failure to obey a lawful order, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. On 4 September 2002, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board if his service is characterized no less favorably than honorable or under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 September 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, the analyst determined that the discharge is improper. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board. The analyst noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board. The analyst determined that denial of an administrative separation board constituted a prejudicial error to the rights of the applicant and the discharge is improper. In view of the foregoing, the analyst recommends to the Board that relief be granted in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. This action does not entail a change to the reentry eligibility (RE) code; however, the Board can consider it. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 25 May 2012 Location: Washington, D.C. Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 214, and an Online Application, dated 19 September 2011 . VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was and is improper. The evidence of record shows that the applicant consulted with legal counsel and requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board. The Board noted that an administrative separation board is a right and required under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, and the record reflects that the applicant did not receive an administrative separation board and did not waive it. The Board determined that denial of an administrative separation board constituted a prejudicial error to the rights of the applicant and the discharge is improper. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. IX. Board Decision Board Vote: Character - Change 5 No change 0 Reason - Change 5 No change 0 (Board member names available upon request) X. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: Secretarial Authority under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200 with an SPD Code of JFF. Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: No Change XI. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20110018361 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 3 pages