IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 January 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120011174 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests remission or cancellation of his Reserve Officers' Training Corps (ROTC) debt of $37,204.50. 2. The applicant states he believes his debt should be cancelled based on the failure of the University of Massachusetts (UMASS) ROTC program to provide proper support, unfair treatment, favoritism by the cadre to certain cadets, and giving misleading advice in regard to his scholarship. 3. The applicant provides no documentary evidence in support of his request. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. On 7 October 2009, the applicant entered into a cadet contract by completing a DA Form 597-3 (Army Senior ROTC Scholarship Cadet Contract). By signing the contract, he acknowledged his understanding of the conditions of the contract and that he concurred with them. At the time the applicant entered into his ROTC contract he further acknowledged his understanding that if he failed to complete the educational requirements of his agreement or was disenrolled from the ROTC program, the Secretary of the Army or his designee could order him to active duty as an enlisted Soldier; or in lieu of being ordered to active duty, he could be required to repay financial assistance he received through the ROTC program, plus interest. 2. On 1 March 2011, the applicant was placed on ROTC probation, and on 23 March 2011, he was placed on a leave of absence pending disenrollment. The reasons cited for the action were the applicant's unexcused absences from physical training (PT) and lab and his multiple incidents of being late for military science classes. 3. On 18 July 2011, the professor of military leadership of the UMASS ROTC program issued a memorandum notifying the applicant he was initiating his disenrollment from the ROTC program based on his failure to maintain the minimum semester or cumulative grade point average (GPA) as demonstrated by his Fall 2009 and Spring 2011 semesters. He further indicated the applicant had been counseled and placed on an administrative suspension for Spring 2011 after receiving a 1.7 GPA. The professor of military leadership also stated he was initiating the applicant's disenrollment for his indifferent attitude and lack of interest in military training as evidenced by his frequent unexcused absences from PT. 4. On 5 August 2011, the applicant acknowledged the notification of disenrollment of 18 July 2011. 5. On 8 November 2011, a board of officers published its findings and recommendations regarding the applicant's disenrollment from the ROTC program. The applicant elected not to attend the hearing based on his being at his home of record in Nevada. The board of officers, after considering all the available evidence, recommended the applicant be disenrolled from the ROTC program and that the applicant be required to repay his ROTC scholarship debt. The board of officers also recommended the applicant not be ordered to active duty. 6. On 8 November 2011, the executive officer of the UMASS ROTC completed an investigation into the disenrollment board of officers proceedings completed on the applicant. Based on his findings, the executive officer recommended the applicant not be retained in ROTC either as a scholarship or non-scholarship cadet; that the applicant should be disenrolled from ROTC and not released from his ROTC contract; that the applicant should be ordered to active duty in an enlisted status; that the applicant should be ordered to repay his valid debt to the U.S. Government (if not allowed to enlist) comprised of advanced educational assistance received in the form of scholarship benefits. 7. There is no evidence indicating the applicant has enlisted in any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces subsequent to his ROTC disenrollment. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's request that his ROTC debt be forgiven because his disenrollment was unjust has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim. 2. The evidence shows the applicant entered into a valid ROTC scholarship contract on 7 October 2009. It also shows he failed to meet the requirements of the contract by not maintaining the required 2.0 GPA. In addition, the applicant displayed an indifferent attitude and lack of interest in military training disinterested attitude toward military service classes and had a history of conduct and performance related issues as evidenced by his repeated absence from PT and lateness for military science classes. 3. Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence provided by the applicant that would support a conclusion that there was some error or injustice related to the disenrollment process, it appears the applicant's disenrollment processing was accomplished in accordance with applicable regulatory guidance. 4. In addition, there is no evidence the applicant has attempted to enlist in any branch of the U.S. Armed Forces subsequent to his ROTC disenrollment. As a result, there appears to be no equity basis for relief. 5. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011174 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120011174 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1