IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 July 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001332 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Action Badge, and any other awards he is authorized as a result of his active duty service. 2. The applicant states he served in Vietnam and he earned the awards. 3. The applicant provides a DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 10 February 1969. Upon completion of initial entry training he was awarded military occupational specialty 62M (Heavy Equipment Operator). 3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 38 (Record of Assignments), while in Vietnam he was assigned to the: * 228th Supply and Service (S&S) Company from 10 March through 5 August 1970 * 758th S&S Company from 6 August through 9 October 1970 * 229th S&S Company from 10 October to 1 January 1971 b. item 38, he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service 4. His record is void of any derogatory information or a unit commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being recommended for or awarded the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. 5. On 5 January 1971, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee. He completed 1 year, 10 months, and 26 days of total active service with no time lost and he attained the rank/grade of specialist four (SP4)/E-4. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Automatic Rifle Bar (M-16) * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) 6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states: a. The Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. This same regulation states a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each credited campaign. Appendix B shows that during his service in Vietnam, he participated in the following three campaigns: * Vietnam Winter - Spring 1970 (1 November 1969 - 30 April 1970) * Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May - 30 June 1970) * Vietnamese Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970 - 30 June 1971) b. The Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. c. The Combat Action Badge is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined. Award for qualifying service in any previous conflict is not authorized. Retroactive awards of the Combat Action Badge are not authorized prior to 18 September 2001. 8. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units, during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Vietnam Service Medal, Combat Action Badge, and any other awards he is authorized has been carefully considered. 2. The evidence of record confirms he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his active duty service. His record is void of any derogatory information or a commander's disqualification that would have precluded him from being awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 10 February 1969 through January 1971 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. 3. He served a period of qualifying service in Vietnam for entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, he participated in three campaigns during his service in Vietnam that entitles him to three bronze service stars for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars. 4. He served during a qualifying period of service in Vietnam for entitlement to the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. 5. All units in Vietnam were cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation during his period of assignment. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 6. The Combat Action Badge is authorized from 18 September 2001 to a date to be determined. Award for qualifying service in any previous conflict is not authorized. He was released from active duty in 1971. Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant's request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____x___ ____x___ ____x___ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 10 February 1969 through January 1971; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Combat Action Badge or correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award. ________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for correction of military records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130001332 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130001332 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1