IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 December 2013 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130005337 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the Unites States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show all of his awards. 2. The applicant states he is claiming benefits for being in Vietnam. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 November 1965 for a period of 3 years. He completed his training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 57H (cargo handler). 3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: a. item 31 (Foreign Service) he served in: * U.S. Army Pacific (USARPAC) - Thailand from 20 October 1966 through 16 July 1968 * U.S. Army Europe (USAREUR) from 22 August 1968 through 8 November 1968 b. item 38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was assigned to the 233rd Transportation Company in USARPAC. 4. On 11 November 1968, he was honorably released from active duty as an overseas returnee. He completed 2 years, 11 months, and 13 days of total active service. His DD Form 214 shows he was authorized the National Defense Service Medal. 5. There is no evidence which shows he served in Vietnam. 6. There is no evidence that shows his unit in Thailand served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. 7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides Department of the Army policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning individual military decorations, service medals and ribbons, and similar devices awarded in recognition of accomplishments. It states: a. the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included attachment to or assignment for 1 or more days with an organization participating in or directly supporting military operations. Members in Thailand, Laos, or Cambodia during the same period and serving in direct support of operations in Vietnam are also eligible for this award. Direct support is defined as services being supplied to participating forces in the area of eligibility and includes: * units, ships, and aircraft providing it involves actually entering the designated area * ships and aircraft providing fire, patrol, guard, reconnaissance, or other military support within the designated area of eligibility b. the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Although the applicant contends he served in Vietnam, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence to support this contention. 2. There is no evidence that shows the applicant's unit in Thailand served in direct support of operations in Vietnam. 3. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X ______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130005337 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130005337 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1