IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000405 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that the narrative reason for his discharge be changed to a more favorable reason that will afford him benefits. 2. The applicant states he is unable to receive veteran’s benefits because of his discharge and is currently disabled. 3. The applicant provides no additional documents in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 November 1979 for a period of 3 years, training as an armor crewman and assignment to Europe. 3. He was transferred to Fort Knox, KY to undergo one-station unit training. On 7 May 1980, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was initiating action to discharge him from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 5-33 and the Trainee Discharge Program (TDP). He cited as the basis for his recommendation the applicant’s negative attitude toward his duties and responsibilities as a Soldier, his failure to work with his peers, avoiding work whenever possible, failure to show interest in instructions given, failure to respond to repeated counseling, inability to work without constant supervision, and his expressed comments that he did not care and he wanted out of the Army. 4. The applicant declined the opportunity to make a statement in his own behalf and declined a separation physical examination. He also acknowledged he understood that due to non-completion of requisite active duty time, Veterans Administration (VA) and other benefits normally associated with completion of honorable active service would be affected and that he would not be permitted to reenter the Army for 2 years from the date of separation. 5. The appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge on 9 May 1980 and directed the applicant be furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate. 6. Accordingly, he was honorably discharged on 14 May 1980 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33f(2) under the TDP for marginal or non-productive service. He had served 5 months and 17 days of active service. 7. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 5-33, in effect at the time, provided the criteria for the separation of personnel under the TDP who lacked the necessary motivation, discipline, ability, or aptitude to become a productive Soldier. It states, in pertinent part, that commanders may expeditiously discharge members of the Regular Army, Army National Guard or United States Army Reserve who have completed 179 days or less of active duty and have demonstrated that they cannot or will not adapt socially or emotionally to military life. Commanders were authorized to issue either an Honorable or General Discharge and the separation code for discharge under the TDP was "JET." The appropriate RE Code to be assigned to individuals discharged with a separation code of "JET" is a "3." Under today's standards, individuals discharged with less than 180 days of active duty service will receive a discharge with "UNCHARACTERIZED" service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s administrative discharge was administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations with no indication of any violations of the applicant’s rights. 2. The evidence of record shows that the type of discharge and the reasons therefore were appropriate under the circumstances and the applicant has failed to show otherwise. 3. The fact that the applicant is attempting to obtain VA benefits has been noted. However, there is no error or injustice in his case and the VA administers its program under its own regulations and policies and changing the applicant’s discharge solely for the purpose of qualifying for VA benefits is not within the purview of this Board. 4. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis for granting the applicant’s request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000405 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140000405 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1