IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 28 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140002046 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states he was wounded in combat and was never awarded a Purple Heart. 3. The applicant provides: * Self-authored statement, dated 1 July 2011 * Friend's statement, dated 26 April 2011 * Clark County Veterans' Service Officer Transmittal Form, dated 15 January 2014 * Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 11 July 1966 * Doctor's Progress notes, dated 15 July 1966 and 10 October 1966 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 October 1964. He completed training as an infantry direct fire crewman. He arrived in Vietnam on 4 January 1966. 3. On 14 August 1966, the applicant departed Vietnam en-route to the United States. He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 13 October 1967. He was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Reinforcement). 4. The Purple Heart is not listed on the applicant's DD Form 214. 5. Item 40 (Wounds) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. 6. A review of the applicant's Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain any documents that show he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces. 7. Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty. 8. The applicant provides a self-authored statement contending that he was in Vietnam unloading supply choppers when the unit to which he was assigned began receiving incoming fire. During one of his trips to the chopper a mortar round or rocket hit very close to the unit and he suddenly felt pain in his eye. He was evacuated to the field hospital at Pleiku and the doctor attempted to get a piece of metal out of his eye with different instruments, but he could not. After about a week the metal came out on its own. Nothing was ever said about the Purple Heart and he never asked about it. 9. The applicant also provides a statement from his friend contending that the applicant received an eye injury as he states. He provides a Chronological Record of Medical Care and Doctor's Progress Notes showing that he had a foreign body in his eye which finally disappeared. 10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 11. Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management), chapter 9, in effective at the time, provided for the preparation and submission of the DA Form 20. Paragraph 9-53 states that item 40 (Wounds) of the DA Form 20 shows the wounds and reflects a brief description of wounds or injuries requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization and the date wounded or injured. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's contentions have been noted. His supporting evidence has been considered. However, the statements and medical documents provided by the applicant are not sufficiently mitigating to warrant the requested relief. 2. There is no evidence contained in his OMPF showing he was wounded as a result of hostile action by enemy forces while he was in Vietnam. There is no entry made on his DA Form 20, and his name is not shows on The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing. 3. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x___ ___x____ ___x_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002046 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140002046 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1