IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 19 March 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140010231 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that she be afforded active duty survivor benefits based on the death of her husband, a former service member (FSM) who was serving on active duty at the time of his death. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM was serving on active duty at the time of his death and she believes that the Army fraudulently created orders revoking his active duty after his death. She goes on to state that initially she was assigned a casualty assistance officer, but was later told that it was a mistake. She further states that her documents show that he was on active duty and to date she has received no active duty surviving spouse benefits and believes that she is entitled to receive them. 3. The applicant provides a list of documents enclosed with her application on page 6 of her application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The FSM initially served on active duty as an infantryman from 3 January 1989 until he was honorably released from active duty on 16 March 1992. He had served 3 years, 2 months and 14 days of active service. 2. On 26 August 2008, he was commissioned as a United States Army Reserve (USAR) captain (CPT) in the Veterinary Corps. He was initially assigned to a USAR Troop Program Unit (TPU) in Round Rock, Texas. 3. In 2012, he was reassigned to a Civil Affairs Battalion in Upland, California and on 23 January 2012, orders number 12-023—00028 ordered the applicant to active duty in support of Operation Enduring Freedom with a report date to Fort Benning, Georgia effective 30 March 2012. However, on the following day those orders were revoked and he was reassigned to the Army Medical Department (AMEDD) Professional Management Command, Forest Park, Georgia. On 9 February 2012, he was reassigned to the 426th Civil Affairs Battalion, a TPU in Upland, California. 4. On 13 April 2012, the FSM was found dead in his residence as a result of the toxic effects of Isoflurane. The FSM was discovered when his employer called because he failed to report to work and the FSM was found dead face down in his bed with a plastic bag over his head with multiple containers of Isoflurane nearby. 5. A review of the FSM’s official records and the documents submitted by the applicant failed to show any evidence of the FSM serving on active duty at the time of his death. Additionally, there is no evidence to show that he was drilling with his USAR unit on Friday, 13 April 2012. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s contention that she should be afforded the survivor benefits afforded the spouses of deceased active duty members has been noted and appears to lack merit. 2. The applicant has failed to show through the evidence submitted with her application and the evidence of record, any evidence that would indicate that the FSM was serving on active duty at the time of his death. 3. It is also noted that the FSM’s death was discovered as a result of his employer calling regarding his failure to come to work. Therefore, unless evidence can be provided to show that his employer was an officer or commander in the Army, it is reasonable to presume that he had civilian employers at the time of his death. 4. Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant the applicant’s request. 5. However, the applicant is encouraged to contact the nearest Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in regards to any benefits she may be entitled. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X___ ____X___ ____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. 2. The Board wishes to extend its condolences to the applicant on the passing of her late husband, and wants to thank the applicant for the sacrifices she made and for her husband’s service to the United States. The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his honorable service in arms. _______ _ X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010231 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20140010231 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1