BOARD DATE: 19 December 2017 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160006585 BOARD VOTE: _________ _______ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING _x_______ _x_______ __x____ DENY APPLICATION 2 Enclosures 1. Board Determination/Recommendation 2. Evidence and Consideration BOARD DATE: 19 December 2017 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160006585 BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ________x_________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. BOARD DATE: 19 December 2017 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160006585 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the name KBW instead of JKB. 2. The applicant states he changed his name due to his father murdering his mother. 3. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * 2-page Judgment of Adoption CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 1 June 1966. Item 1 NAME (Last Name – First Name – Middle Name) of the applicant's DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows the applicant's name as JKB. 3. Every document in the applicant's Official Military Personnel File shows his name as JKB. 4. The applicant was honorably discharged on 11 March 1968. Item 1 NAME (Last Name - First Name – Middle Name) of his DD Form 214 shows the applicant's name as JKB. He also signed this document, spelling his name as JKB. 5. The applicant provides a 2-page Judgment of Adoption filed 27 February 1969, in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Yolo, which ordered that the applicant would be known as KBW. REFERENCES: Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), then in effect, prescribed the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active service. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. DISCUSSION: 1. The evidence of record shows that upon his induction into the Army of the United States on 1 June 1966, the applicant's name was listed as JKB. This name is consistent with the name on every document in his service records. 2. The applicant was honorably discharged on 11 March 1968; however, his name was not legally changed until 27 February 1969. The Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records for historical purposes. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed. 3. A copy of this decisional document will be filed in the applicant's military records. This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the name he now uses and the name under which he served. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings AR20150000953 Enclosure 1 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20160006585 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Enclosure 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20160006585 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Enclosure 2