BOARD DATE: 8 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160017603 BOARD VOTE: _________ _______ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING _____x___ ____x____ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION 2 Enclosures 1. Board Determination/Recommendation 2. Evidence and Consideration BOARD DATE: 8 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160017603 BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. BOARD DATE: 8 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160017603 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his date of birth (DOB) on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge). 2. The applicant states his DOB is not as shown on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides copies of: * Virginia birth certificate * DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. It is believed that the applicant's military records were lost or destroyed in the National Personnel Records Center fire of 1973. Information herein was obtained from documents provided by the applicant. The military record available for review in this case is the applicant’s DD Form 214. 3. The applicant's birth certificate shows a DOB in . 4. The applicant served on active duty in the Army of the United States (AUS) from 26 August 1954 through 9 August 1956. 5. The DD Form 214 shows a DOB in REFERENCES: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. It establishes standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214 and states the entry for the date of birth is to be taken from the enlistment document. 2. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)), states the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. It will decide cases on the evidence of record and it is not an investigative body. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. DISCUSSION: 1. The DD Form 214 shows a DOB in not as stated by the applicant. is when the applicant was released from active duty. 2. The applicant's birth certificate shows a DOB in . Based on a lack of records to verify what birth year the applicant listed on his induction documents, the birth certificate and his DD Form 214 are the only source documents that could be used. 3. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, this Board is reluctant to recommend those records be changed. 4. The applicant is advised that a copy of these proceedings will be filed in his reconstructed record. This will serve to clarify any confusion over the date of birth shown on his DD Form 214 and that reflected on his certificate of birth. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings AR20150000953