IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160018150 BOARD VOTE: ___x_____ ___x___ ___x____ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION 2 Enclosures 1. Board Determination/Recommendation 2. Evidence and Consideration IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160018150 BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 11 July 1963 through 28 June 1966; and * amending his DD Form 214 to add the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) __________x_______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 22 August 2018 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160018150 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM). 2. The applicant states he served 3 years without receiving disciplinary action. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 11 July 1963. 3. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" or "unknown" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his entire period of active military service. 4. Special Orders Number 178 issued by Headquarters, 4th Training Regiment on 27 August 1963, awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). 5. There is no evidence in the available records that shows he was awarded the AGCM; neither is there evidence of a commander's disqualification for the award. Additionally, there is no evidence of any convictions by courts-martial or receipt of nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice. 6. On 28 June 1966, he was honorably released from active duty. His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded or authorized the National Defense Service Medal and the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal. His DD Form 214 does not show the AGCM among his authorized awards. REFERENCES: Army Regulation 600-65 (Service Medals), in effect at the time, stated the AGCM was awarded for each three years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, one year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than three years but more than one year. A Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings, including those pertinent to attendance at service schools, must have all been recorded as "excellent" or higher, except that ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration would not be disqualifying. There must have been no convictions by court-martial. There was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders. DISCUSSION: 1. The applicant served on active duty during the period 11 July 1963 through 28 June 1966. During this period, he received all "excellent" or "unknown" conduct and efficiency ratings. The evidence shows he met the criteria for award of the AGCM (1st Award). 2. Special orders awarded him the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14). This badge is not listed on his DD Form 214. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings Enclosure 1 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20160018150 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Enclosure 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20160018150 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS Enclosure 2