ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20160019293 APPLICANT REQUESTS: * all negative documentation included in his discharge packet to be removed from his discharge packet * change Item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) of his DD 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show RE-1 vice RE-4 * change date of separation from 3 April 2005 to his normally scheduled expiration term of service (ETS) date of 2 December 2006 * to be retroactively awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period of 28 June 2002 through 27 June 2005 * grant a retroactive promotion to the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * direct the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) to audit his military pay account and provide all back pay and entitlements to which he is entitled from the day after his improper separation of 4 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * self-authored statement (3 parts) * Exhibits 1-24 of applicable service documents * Exhibit 1, Army Achievement Medal (1st Award), dated 27 August 1997 * Exhibit 2, Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award), dated 7 January 1998 * Exhibit 3, 1st Honorable Discharge/Reenlist, dated 4 August 1999 * Exhibit 4, Commandant’s List – Primary Leadership Development Course, dated 2 February 2000 * Exhibit 5, Army Commendation Medal (1st Award), 7 March 2000 * Exhibit 6, Certificates of Achievement/Training, June 1996 – March 2000 * Exhibit 7, Rehabilitative Transfer to 269th Signal Company/504th Signal Battalion/11th Signal Brigade, dated 14 May 2001 * Exhibit 8, Promotion to sergeant (SGT), dated 1 December 2001 * Exhibit 9, Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER), December 2001 thru November 2002 * Exhibit 10, Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award), 7 June 2002 * Exhibit 11, 2nd Honorable Discharge/Reenlist, dated 21 October 2002 * Exhibit 12, Orders to Jordan, dated 5 March 2003 * Exhibit 13, Orders to K-TNOSC, dated 4 November 2003 * Exhibit 14, Army Achievement Medal (3rd Award), dated 11 May 2004 * Exhibit 15, NCOER, November 2003 thru March 2004 * Exhibit 16, Enlisted Record Brief, 2 September 2004 * Exhibit 17, NCOER, April 2004 thru November 2004 * Exhibit 18, 3rd Honorable Discharge/Reenlist, dated 2 December 2004 * Exhibit 19, Department of the Army Promotion Point Cutoff Scores for 1 February 2005, dated 1 January 2005 * Exhibit 20, Orders to Fort Hood, TX, dated 4 January 2005 * Exhibit 21, Army Commendation Medal (3rd Award), 15 January 2005 * Exhibit 22, Headquarters, Department of the Army (HQDA) SGT/SSG Promotion Selection By Name List (Selected for 1 February 2005), dated 1 February 2005 * Exhibit 23, DD Form 214, dated 3 April 2005 * Exhibit 24, Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) decision dated 31 August 2016 FACTS: 1. The applicant states on 1 July 2015, he applied to the ADRB, and on 31 August 2016, in a records review, the ADRB determined that the discharge was improper. The ADRB voted to change the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority. Because of ADRB’s finding(s) and decision(s) he requests correction of the error(s) and injustice(s) listed on his application. 2. The applicant provides: a. Self-authored three-part statement-Part 1 (9 pages). He requests all negative documentation included in his discharge packet be removed from his service record. He states, because the original discharge was deemed improper, all negative documents leading up to his discharge in accordance with AR 635-200, chapter 9 should be removed. He identified 15 related documents (identified as negative documents in his self-authored statement). They are as follows: * DA Form 4856 (General Counseling Form), dated 21 July 2004 * memorandum for record, dated 7 January 2005, subject: Rehabilitation Failure * DA Form 4466 (Patient Progress Report), dated 7 January 2005 * DA Form 7095 (Army Drug and Alcohol Prevention Control Program (ADAPCP) Outpatient Discharge Summary), not dated * DA Form 7096 (Army Substance Abuse Program (ASAP) Outpatient Aftercare Plan), dated 7 January 2005 * Rehabilitation Team Meeting, dated 7 January 2005 * DA Form 4856, 25 January 2005 * Legal Action Request, dated 25 January 2005 * Drug and Alcohol Management Information System (DAMIS) patient Intake Report (9 pages), printed 14 February 2005 * memorandum for record, dated 14 February 2005, subject (Summary of Rehabilitation Efforts) * memorandum to the applicant while assigned to the Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment (HHD), 36th Signal Battalion, dated 17 March 2005, subject: Recommended for Separation under Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, Chapter 9, paragraph 902 (Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure) (notification to applicant of intent to separate) * memorandum to commander, HHD, 36th Signal Battalion, dated 18 March 2005, subject: Separation Under AR 636-200, Chapter 9 * memorandum to commander, 36th Signal Battalion, 1st Signal Brigade, dated 18 March 2005, subject: Recommended for Separation under AR 635-200, Chapter 9, paragraph 9-2 (Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure) * memorandum to the Commander, 1st Signal Brigade, Network Enterprise Technology Command, 9th Army Signal Command, subject: Recommended for Separation under AR 635-200, Chapter 9, paragraph 9-2 (Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure) (Intermediate Commander’s endorsement) * memorandum to the commander, C Detachment, 516th Personnel Service Battalion, dated 19 March 2005, subject: Separation under AR 635-200, Chapter 9, Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure (Separation Authority approval) b. He requests his RE Code be changed to RE-1 thereby making him eligible for continued military service. He was assigned an automatic RE-4, ineligible for further military service, because of the discharge under AR 635-200, Chapter 9. Because the ADRB deemed the discharge was improper, and the narrative reason was changed to Secretarial Authority under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-3, in addition to Separation Program Designator (SPD) change to JFF, the RE Code originally given (RE-4) is no longer applicable. c. He requests a change of his date of separation from 3 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006. He states if the ADRB decides to change the date of separation to his contractually scheduled ETS date, the period of service to be eligible for the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) would be applicable. He requests a retroactive award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period of 28 June 2002 through 28 June 2005. d. He further requests to be granted a retroactive promotion to SSG//E-6. He states he was listed on the HQDA Monthly Sergeant/Staff Sergeant Promotion Selection Name List for a 1 February 2005 promotion effective date. A copy of the selection list containing the applicant’s name is attached in the supporting documents. He states he was not promoted to SSG because he was undergoing separation proceedings. e. He also requests the Board direct the DFAS to audit his military pay account and provide all back pay and entitlements to which he was entitled from the time of his improper separation to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006. f. In his self-authored statement-Part 2 (3 pages), he summarized and/or highlights the positives and negatives of his military service. He acknowledges his field-grade Article 15 in the 2001 timeframe for driving while under the influence of alcohol and detailed the recognitions by his leadership for each of his accomplishments, which are all provided in the supporting documents. g. In his self-authored statement-Part 3 (1 page), he concludes that he was a model Soldier and NCO that the Army needed him to be. The Army recognized him for his actions and behavior on multiple occasions. He requests the Board find in favor for him, by granting him relief. 3. The applicant provides 24 exhibits of applicable service documents, including the ADRB decision dated 23 September 2016, where he requested the following because he states the narrative reason for separation was improper and his commander’s reasons for separation were inconsistent with the evidence used to initiate separation: * a narrative reason change * a RE code change * back pay * retroactively award of the Army Good Conduct Medal * removal of all negative documentation related to his discharge from his record * be given service credit for his third reenlistment * be considered for up to 20 years of service * be officially retired with full benefits a. The ADRB determined the applicant’s discharge was improper because, the applicant was entitled to an administrative separation board due to his total number years of active military service. The ADRB voted and granted relief as outlined below: * issue a new DD Form 214 * change narrative reason to Secretarial Authority * change separation Authority to AR 635-200, Chapter 5-3 * change the SPD Code to JFF * no change to the RE code * no change the applicant’s rank or pay grade b. The ADRB determination did not: * remove all negative documentation included in his discharge packet * change date of separation from 3 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 * retroactively award the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period of 28 June 2002 through 27 June 2005 * grant a retroactive promotion to the rank of SSG/E-6 * direct the DFAS to audit his military pay account and provide all back pay and entitlements to which he is entitled from the day after his improper separation of 4 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 4. A review of the applicant’s service record shows: a. He enlisted in the Regular Army for 4 years on 25 June 1996 and attained the rank/grade of SGT/E-5. He reenlisted as listed below with a final ETS date of 1 December 2006. * on 4 August 1999 for 4 years * on 22 October 2002 for 4 years * 2 December 2004 for 2 years b. On 26 February 1999, the applicant was initially enrolled in the ASAP and was reported to continue consuming alcoholic beverages while enrolled in the program. Additionally, during the extended period of enrollment, he failed to adequately participate in rehabilitation by avoiding contact with the community counseling center until confronted. c. On 17 March 2005, the applicant's immediate commander notified the applicant of the intent to separate him under the provisions of AR 635-200 (Personnel Separations-Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 9, paragraph 9-2 for alcohol or other drug abuse rehabilitation failure. His commander specified in the notification, the applicant was enrolled in ASAP initially 26 February 1999 and continued to consume alcoholic beverages while enrolled in the program. Additionally, during his extended period of enrollment, he failed to adequately participate in rehabilitation by avoiding contact with the Community Counseling Center until confronted. His commander informed him that he recommended that the applicant receive an Honorable Discharge Certificate. d. The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and advisement of his rights on 17 March 2005. He acknowledged that he had been afforded the opportunity to consult with appointed counsel for consultation; or military counsel of his own choice, if he or she is reasonably available; or civilian counsel at his own expense. He stated he had been advised by his consulting counsel of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him for Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure, under chapter 9 of AR 635-200, and its effects; of the rights available to him; and the effect of any action taken by him in waiving his rights. He understand that if he had less six years of total active and reserve military service at the time of initiation of separation and he were being considered for separation for Alcohol or Other Drug Abuse Rehabilitation Failure under AR 635-200, Chapter 9, Paragraph 9-2, he is entitled to have his case heard by an administrative separation board. He requested to have his case considered by an administrative separation board and personal appearance before an administrative separation board, (if his service is characterized no less favorably than honorable). e. On 18 March 2005, the immediate commander initiated separation action against the applicant He cited the specific factual reasons for action recommended as the applicant's enrollment in ASAP initially on 26 February 1999 and his continued consumption of alcoholic beverages while enrolled in the program. Additionally, during this extended period of enrollment he failed to adequately participate in rehabilitation by avoiding contact with the Community Counseling Center until confronted. The commander recommended an honorable characterization of service. His battalion commander recommended approval of the discharge action. f. On 19 March 2005, the separation authority approved the applicant's discharge and ordered he be issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate. The applicant was accordingly discharged on 3 April 2005. g. His DD Form 214 show he was honorably discharged under the provisions of chapter 9 of AR 635-200 due to Alcohol rehabilitation failure. He completed 8 years, 9 months, and 9 days. His DD Form 214 further shows in: * Block 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank), SGT * Block 4b (Pay Grade), E-5 * Block 12h (Effective date of Pay Grade) 1 December 2001 * Block 25 (Separation Authority), AR 635-200, Chapter 9 * Block 26 (Separation Code), JPD * Block 27 (Reentry Code), 4 * Block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure 5. On 23 September 2015, the ADRB determined the applicant’s discharge was improper because, the applicant was entitled to an administrative separation board due to his total number years of active military service. The ADRB voted and granted relief as outlined below: * issue a new DD Form 214 * change narrative reason to Secretarial Authority * change separation Authority to AR 635-200, Chapter 5-3 * change the SPD Code to JFF * no change to the RE code * no change the applicant’s rank or pay grade 6. The ADRB’s determination did not: * remove all negative documentation included in his discharge packet * change date of separation from 3 April 2005 to his normally scheduled expiration term of service (ETS) date of 2 December 2006 * retroactively award the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period of 28 June 2002 through 27 June 2005 * grant a retroactive promotion to the rank of Staff Sergeant/E-6 * direct the DFAS to audit his military pay account and provide all back pay and entitlements to which he is entitled from the day after his improper separation of 4 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 7. The applicant’s DD form 214 was voided and he was reissued a new DD Form 214 that reflected the recommendations as directed by the ADRB. His reissued DD Form 214 shows in: * Block 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank), SGT * Block 4b (Pay Grade), E-5 * Block 12h (Effective date of Pay Grade), 1 December 2001 * Block 25 (Separation Authority), AR 635-200, Paragraph 5-3 * Block 26 (Separation Code), JFF * Block 27 (Reentry Code), 4 * Block 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation), Secretarial Authority 8. By regulation (AR 635-200), when the reason for separation requires the administrative board procedure, the commander will notify the Soldier in writing that his separation has been recommended per this regulation. The Soldier will be advised of the following rights: a. To confer with consulting counsel. Soldiers may also consult with civilian counsel at their own expense. b. To obtain copies of documents that will be sent to the separation authority supporting the proposed separation. c. For a separation under chapter 9 or 14 of this regulation, based on a positive urinalysis, the Soldier will be provided, upon request, a copy of the supporting laboratory documents. Classified documents may be summarized. d. To a hearing before an administrative separation board. e. To present written statements instead of board proceedings. To retain civilian counsel at no expense to the Government. If the respondent is absent, the counsel may present the case before an administrative discharge board. 9. The applicant requests: * all negative documentation be removed from his discharge packet * his RE Code be changed from RE-4 to RE-1 * his date of separation be changed from 3 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 * to be retroactively awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (3rd Award) for the period of 28 June 2002 through 27 June 2005 * retroactive promotion to the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 * direct DFAS to pay him for entitlements from 4 April 2005 to his normally scheduled ETS date of 2 December 2006 10. By regulation (AR 635-200), a member who has been referred to the ASAP for alcohol or drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. However, an honorable discharge is required if limited use information is used in the discharge process. a. A Soldier with 6 or more year of total service is entitled to a separation board. However, a Soldier may waive such board contingent on receiving a favorable characterization of service. b. He requested to have his case considered by an administrative separation board and personal appearance before an administrative separation board, if his service is characterized no less favorably than honorable. His commander recommended an honorable discharge and the separation authority granted an honorable discharge. c. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed. 11. By regulation (AR 635-200 and AR 635-5-1), Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 9, alcohol rehabilitation failure, are assigned SPD Code “JPD”, the RE Code associated with this SPD Code is “4.” Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 5-3, for secretarial authority are assigned SPD Code “JFF”, the RE Code associated with this SPD Code is “1.” 12. By regulation (AR 601-210), Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army RE codes: * RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army; they are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met * RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable. They are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted * RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification; they are ineligible for enlistment. 13. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of his discharge provides instructions for determining the RE Code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers. This cross reference table shows the SPD code and a corresponding RE Code. The SPD Code "JPD" has a corresponding RE Code "4." The SPD Code “JFF” has a corresponding RE Code of “1.” 14. By regulation (AR 635-5), Block 12b (Separation Date This Period) lists the Soldier’s transition date. This date may not be the contractual date if the Soldier was separated early, voluntarily extends, is extended to make up lost time, or is retained on active duty for the convenience of the Government. 15. By regulation (AR 600-8-19), a Soldier removed from a list and later completely exonerated from the reason that caused the removal will be reinstated. To be completely exonerated, the action that caused the initial removal must have been erroneous or should not have been imposed so that the Soldier is free of any wrong doings or accusation. If however, the Soldier was eligible for promotion prior to reinstatement, the date of rank and effective date will be the date of original eligibility. Furthermore, a Soldier who is pending separation is flagged 9suspended from favorable personnel actions) and is placed in a non-promotable status. 16. By regulation (AR 15-185), the ABCMR corrects Army records. A record correction may result in monetary entitlement (or debt). The ABCMR will furnish DFAS copies of decisions potentially affecting monetary entitlement or benefits. DFAS will treat such decisions as claims for payment by or on behalf of the applicant. The DFAS will settle claims on the basis of the corrected military record. The DFAS will compute the amount due, if any. The DFAS may require applicants to furnish additional information to establish their status as proper parties to the claim and to aid in deciding amounts due. 17. By regulation (AR 600-8-22), the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to Soldiers who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 consecutive years (except for first award that ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. There is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal and disqualification must be justified. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board determined that partial relief was warranted. Based upon the documentary evidence within the record, the Board found no error or injustice which would warrant making a change to most of the requested relief. However, based upon the amount of honorable service completed by the applicant prior to his separation, as well as the root cause of the misconduct being related to alcohol abuse, the Board concluded that if the applicant could show he has overcome this addiction to alcohol, the applicant should have an opportunity to receive a waiver and return to active duty to serve, if he so wished. For that reason, the Board recommended that changing the reentry (RE) code to RE-3 was appropriate. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF X X X GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING : : : DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by changing the reentry (RE) code (Item 27 of the DD Form 214) to “3”. 2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to all other requested relief on the applicant’s application. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. AR 635-200, in effect at the time, provides, a. Section II, provides, in part, When the reason for separation requires the administrative board procedure, the commander will notify the Soldier in writing that his separation has been recommended per this regulation. The Soldier will be advised of the following rights: (1) To confer with consulting counsel. Soldiers may also consult with civilian counsel at their own expense. (2) To obtain copies of documents that will be sent to the separation authority supporting the proposed separation. (3) For a separation under chapter 9 or 14 of this regulation, based on a positive urinalysis, the soldier will be provided, upon request, a copy of the supporting laboratory documents. (4) To a hearing before an administrative separation board, if eligible and is requested. (5) To present written statements instead of board proceedings (6) To retain civilian counsel at no expense to the Government. If the respondent is absent, the counsel may present the case before an administrative discharge board b. Paragraph 9-2 provides, a member who has been referred to the ASAP/ADAPCP for alcohol or drug abuse may be separated because of inability or refusal to participate in, cooperate in, or successfully complete such a program if there is a lack of potential for continued Army service and rehabilitation efforts are no longer practical. Army policy states that an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized depending on the applicant’s overall record of service. However, an honorable discharge is required if limited use information is used in the discharge process. 3. AR 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. SPD code JPD is the appropriate code to assign to Soldiers separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 9, alcohol rehabilitation failure. 4. AR 601-210 (Active and Reserve Components Enlistment Program) covers eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and the U.S. Army Reserve. Table 3-1 included a list of the Regular Army RE codes: * RE-1 applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army; they are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met * RE-3 applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable; they are ineligible for enlistment unless a waiver is granted * RE-4 applies to Soldiers who are separated from their last period of service with a nonwaivable disqualification; they are ineligible for enlistment 5. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table in effect at the time of his discharge provides instructions for determining the RE code for Active Army Soldiers and Reserve Component Soldiers. This cross reference table shows the SPD code and a corresponding RE code. The SPD code "JPD" has a corresponding RE code "4." The SPD Code “JFF” has a corresponding RE Code of “1.” 6. AR 600-8-19, paragraph 3-32, provides in part, a Soldier removed from a list and later completely exonerated from the reason that caused the removal will be reinstated. To be completely exonerated, the action that caused the initial removal must have been erroneous or should not have been imposed so that the Soldier is free of any wrong doings or accusation. If however, the Soldier was eligible for promotion prior to reinstatement, the date of rank and effective date will be the date of original eligibility. 7. AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Although there is no automatic entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal, disqualification must be justified. 8. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service. It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate. Chapter 2 contained guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214. The version of the regulation in effect at the time stated: * Block 4: Grade, Rate, or Rank. enter active duty grade or rank and pay grade are accurate at time of separation * Block 12b: Separation Date This Period. List the Soldier’s transition date. This date may not be the contractual date if the Soldier was separated early, voluntarily extends, is extended to make up lost time, or is retained on active duty for the convenience of the Government * Block 26: Separation Code. Obtain the correct entry from AR 635–5–1, which provides the corresponding SPD code for the regulatory authority and reason for separation * Block 27: Reentry Code. AR 601–210 determines reentry eligibility and provides regulatory guidance on reentry codes ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20160019293 11 1