ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: . BOARD DATE: 18 October 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20170001662 APPLICANT REQUESTS: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 31 January 1984, to show: (1) his complete military service in the Regular Army (RA) vice the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) from February 1982 to February 1989, (2) he was promoted to the rank of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7, (3) he attended and completed the following schools: * military occupational specialty (MOS) 91D * Basic Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) School in 1983 * Advanced NCO School in 1985 * Jump Training in 1986 (3) he was a Drill Sergeant candidate and selected as an Assistant Drill Sergeant in 1984, (4) he was awarded the Expert Field Medical Pin (i.e., Badge) b. removal of two DA Forms 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his record, and c. removal of information in his record that belongs to someone else. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * DD Form 214 * medical records * two DA Forms 2627 FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states: a. He enlisted in the Regular Army in February and started basic combat training (BCT) in March 1982 at Fort Jackson, SC. After he completed BCT in May 1982, he was transferred to Fort Sam Houston, TX to start Advanced Individual Training (AIT) as a 91D1O (Operation Room Specialist). He completed this course in November 1982 and was transferred to Fort Leonard Wood, MO, where he was promoted to the rank of private first class (PFC)/E-3. b. He then requested to be crossed trained as a 91B1O (Field Medical Specialist) and was granted permission. He received orders and went to Fort Sam Houston, TX for training in March 1983. Upon arrival, he was promoted to corporal (CPL)/E-4 in April 1983. Upon completion of training, he returned to Fort Leonard Wood, MO in October 1983. c. With the invasion of Grenada in October 1983, his combat support unit was put on alert, but the stand-down order was received in November 1983; at this time, he was promoted to sergeant (SGT)/E-5. d. He was transferred to Fort Sill, OK in July 1984, where he was assigned to an infantry unit. He became intrigued at the prospect of infantry, so he applied to the Drill Sergeant School. He was accepted in September 1984 and was transferred to Fort Jackson, SC to attend Drill School. Afterwards, he was assigned to Bravo Company, 2nd Battalion, 8th Brigade, 3rd Platoon as an Assistant Drill Sergeant. e. He achieved the rank of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 in 1985, and attended training to receive his Expert Field Medical Pin in 1985. He was then sent to Fort Sam Houston, TX, where he was promoted to the rank of SFC/E-7 after passing the E-7 examination and having enough points and time in grade (TIG). He was assigned to the Troop Medical Clinic with the 2nd Battalion. f. In 1986, he submitted his request to his chain of command to attend jump training, which was approved, and he was sent to Fort Benning, GA for parachute packing; then to Fort Bragg, NC for jump training with the 82nd Air Assault; then to Fort Campbell, KY for more jump training with the 101st Airborne Division. He returned after he completed jump training, and was assigned to the 1st Air Cavalry at Fort Sam Houston, TX as a flight medic. g. He was separated from the Army and he was assigned to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and briefly to the 25th Mobile Army Surgical Hospital (MASH), in St. Louis, MO, where he became the Noncommissioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC) of the critical care ward. He received a certified letter from the commander of the 25th MASH in January 1991, stating that he was subject to recall in support of Operation Desert Storm because of his MOS. h. His current DD Form 214 only shows his active duty for training (ADT) as a Reservist; however, he was in the RA, and not in the Reserves. He was recently informed of these egregious errors when he applied to get his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Certificate of Eligibility for a home loan. He requested his 201 file from the Records Center Archives through the office of his Congressman. When he received his record, it did not reflect any of the accomplishments he earned while on active duty. He also notes that there were two disciplinary actions in his record for being AWOL, and he was never AWOL. Furthermore, the signatures are not even the same as his. i. While it may be an innocent error, it should not have happened in the first place. Going through his record, as it was sent to him, he noticed numerous errors, including another person's records, incorrect dates of service, documents that shows his service as a Reservist instead of active duty, and wrong dates. While his record does reflect his correct name, social security number, address, and his medical record is correct, everything else is incorrect. He believes that his information was entered into another service members record, which is why he believes it is a human error. 3. The applicant enlisted in U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 26 February 1983 for a period of six years in rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1. 4. Initial ADT Order Number 46-12, issued by the Military Entrance and Processing Station (MEPS), St. Louis, MO, dated 4 March 1983, ordered him to report to BCT at Fort Jackson, SC on 14 March 1983. These Orders subsequently ordered him to attend Advanced Individual Training (AIT) on 20 May 1983, for approximately 24 weeks at Fort Sam Houston, TX for training in MOS 91D1O (Operating Room Specialist.) 5. Order 080-315, issued by Headquarters, United States Army Training Center and Fort Jackson, Fort Jackson, SC, dated 25 April 1983, shows he was released from his attachment in Fort Jackson, SC and was further attached to the 2nd Battalion, Academy of Health Sciences, in Fort Sam Houston, TX, with an effective date of 21 May 1983 for AIT to train in MOS 91B1O (Medical Specialist). 6. Orders 119-191, issued by Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 20 June 1983, relieved him from attachment to the 2nd Battalion Trainees, Academy of Health Sciences and further attached him to the 1st Battalion Trainees, Academy of Health Sciences, with an effective date of 1 July 1983, for a period of 12 weeks, to train in MOS 91D1O, with a starting date of 15 August 1983. 7. A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 29 July 1983, shows that while he was attached to Company E, 1st Battalion, Academy Brigade, Fort Sam Houston, TX, he was absent without leave (AWOL) from 11 July 1983 until his voluntary return to military control on 28 July 1983. 8. His record contains a DA Form 2627, dated 1 August 1983, which shows he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for being AWOL from his unit from 11 July 1983 to 28 July 1983. His punishment consisted of a reduction to PV2/E-2. He appealed his NJP, and the appeal was denied. He signed the form the same day. 9. Orders 176-34, issued by Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, dated 9 September 1983, relieved him from attachment to the 1st Battalion Trainees, Academy of Health Sciences, Fort Sam Houston, TX, and further attached him to the Student Detachment at the Leonard Wood Army Hospital, MO. effective date of 28 September 1983, for a period of 6 weeks to complete Phase II of the MOS 91D1O course. 10. Orders 297-201, issued by Headquarters, US Army Training Center Engineer and Fort Leonard Wood, MO, dated 24 October 1983 awarded him MOS 91D1O, with an effective date of 10 November 1983. The award of this MOS was contingent upon his successful completion of training and graduation. 11. His record contains a DA Form 2627, dated 27 October 1983, which shows he received NJP for failing to go to his appointed place of duty, the General Leonard Wood Army Community Hospital, MO, at the time prescribed, on 24 October 1983. His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay of $50.00 for one months and reduction in pay grade to E-1 (suspended until 27 April 1984). He did not appeal and signed this document on the same day. 12. A DA Form 1059 (Service School Academic Evaluation Report) shows he completed his MOS training for 91D1O, and achieved course standards on 10 November 1983 for Phase I and Phase II training. 13. A DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 18 November 1983, Subject: "CHANGE OF MOS… AND/OR TRAINING STATION" shows Order Number 46-12, issued by the MEPS, St Louis, MO, on 4 March 1983 was amended to show he would attend AIT and receive training in MOS 91B1O (Medical Specialist) vice 91D1O, at Fort Sam Houston, TX. In the remarks section of this documents, it states, "Academic drop from 91D1O[.] 91B1O requested by Headquarters 5th U.S. Army and 25th [Combat Support Hospital] CSH (USAR)." 14. Orders 322-219, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training Center Engineer and Fort Leonard Wood, on 18 November 1983 attached him to the United States Army Academy of Health Sciences, in Fort Sam Houston, TX, with an effective date of 21 November 1983, to complete AIT for MOS 91B1O. 15. Orders 230-3, issued by Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 30 November 1983 relieved him from ADT effective 31 January 1984, and returned to the 25th, CSH in St. Louis, MO, to complete his 6-year military service obligation. 16. Orders 1-35, issued by Headquarters, Fort Sam Houston, TX, on 3 January 1984 awarded him primary MOS of 91B1O effective 31 January 1984. These orders recorded his rank/grade as PV2/E-2. 17. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows the following information: * item 6 (MOS) – he was awarded MOS 91B on 31 January 1984 * item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) – he did not complete his training in MOS 91D – Phase II in 1983, but he did complete his training in MOS 91B in 1984 * item 18 (Appointments and Reductions) – his rank/grade of PV1/E-1 in the USAR was effective 7 May 1984 * item 21 (Time Lost) – he was AWOL for 17 days between 11 July 1983 and 27 July 1983" 18. The applicant's record does not contain any evidence to show he completed or passed all the testing required for award of the Expert Field Medical Badge, nor does his record contain orders awarding him the Expert Field Medical Badge. 19. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards) states that in order to be awarded the Expert Field Medical Badge, personnel must successfully pass all test parts prescribed by Army Regulation 672-10 (Expert Field Medical Badge Test). His record does not show he met all the requirements or that he successfully passed all the tests to be awarded the badge. 20. His DD Form 214 contains the following information: * item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) – "PV2" * item 4b (Pay Grade) – "E2" * item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period) – "83 03 11" * item 12b (Separation Date This Period) – "84 01 31" * item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) – "00 10 20" * item 12i (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) – "89 02 25" * item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) – Army Service Ribbon, Marksman Qualification Badge (Rifle M-16) * item 14 (Military Education) – "Medical Specialist Course 10 wks (Jan 84)" * item 23 (Type of Separation) - "Relief from Active Duty for Training" * item 24 (Character of Service) – "Honorable" * item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – "Reserve Component Personnel upon completion of MOS Training" 21. His record contains two letters of instruction for unexcused absences from his scheduled unit training on 17 and 18 March 1984 and 5 and 6 May 1984. The second letter, dated 7 May 1984 stated he accrued eight unexcused absences. 22. Orders 6-3, issued by Headquarters, 25th MASH, on 7 May 1984 reduced him in grade of rank from "PV2" to "PV1," effective 7 May 1984. 23. On 29 May 1984, he received a letter of instruction for an unexcused absence from annual training (AT), stating he failed to complete AT on 20 May to 2 June 1984. The letter also informed him that if his absence from AT was not excused he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR). 24. His commander notified him in writing that after careful consideration of his complete file and any reason he may have submitted for not meeting his AT requirement, he was declared an unsatisfactory participant, and he would be transferred to the IRR for the balance of his service obligation. 25. Orders 90-23, issued by Headquarters, 102nd United States Army Reserve Command, dated 30 June 1984, relieved the applicant of his current assignment due to unsatisfactory participation, and assigned him to the USAR Control Group (Annual Training) effective 21 May 1984. 26. Orders D-02-018804, issued by United States Army Reserve Personnel Center, on 21 February 1989 honorably discharged him from the Ready Reserve with an effective date of 25 February 1989. 27. The applicant's military record does not contain documentation that shows: * he enlisted in or served in the Regular Army * he was awarded MOS 91D1O * he was promoted beyond the rank/grade of private E-3 * he attended any courses under the NCO education system * his DA Forms 2627 belong to another Soldier or that they were improperly filed in his record * he was awarded the Expert Field Medical Badge * he attended or completed a parachute packing course, Airborne School, Air Assault School, or Drill Sergeant School * he was ever assigned, attached, or on temporary duty to Fort Sill, OK; Fort Benning, GA; Fort Bragg, NC; or Fort Campbell, KY * he served as an assistant drill sergeant, a flight medic, or as the NCOIC of a critical care unit 28. Pursuant to Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), service members must meet the TIG and TIS requirements for advancement to the next higher grade. The applicant’s record shows the highest grade he held was as an E-3, but was reduced in rank to E-2 as a result of an NJP. His record does not show he was ever promoted back to E-3 or that he was recommended or eligible for promotion to E-4, E-5, E-6, or E-7. BOARD DISCUSSION: 1. After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board found that the requested relief is not warranted. 2. The Board agreed that the record clearly and unmistakably shows: * the applicant served only in the USAR * he was not and could not have been promoted to SFC/E-7 * he attended but did not complete the course for MOS 91D 3. The Board agreed that the available records contain no evidence supporting his claim to have attended NCO education system courses or the Airborne School, and no evidence supporting his claim that he was a Drill Sergeant candidate and selected as an Assistant Drill Sergeant. 4. The Board agreed that there is no evidence indicating the applicant met the requirements for award of the Expert Field Medical Badge. 5. The Board agreed that the DA Forms 2627 in question are properly filed in his record. The Board found no evidence of error or injustice in the filing of these documents in his record. 6. In view of the foregoing, with the exception of the removal of documents addressed in Administrative Note(s) below, the Board concluded there is insufficient evidence upon which to recommend granting relief in this case. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :X :X :X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: Other than the action addressed in Administrative Note(s) below, the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE(S): Medical documents belonging to another Soldier have been removed from the applicant's record. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 600-200 dated 15 July 1978, with change 59, in effect at that time, provides policies, responsibilities, and procedures pertaining to career management of Army enlisted personnel. Chapter 7, states the following: a. Promotion of enlisted personnel to grade E-3 through E-9, appointments, grade reductions, and grade restorations will be announced in routine orders. b. Promotion to pay grade E-4. Consistent with sound management, promotion authority to grade E-4 will be delegated to the lowest possible level. This paragraph will be cited as authority for promotion to grade E-4. Criteria for promotion to E-4: * time in service (TIS)-24 months – waiverable * TIG-6 months as an E-3 – waiverable * be in a promotable status. Waivers not granted * be serving in the pay grade next below that in which promotion is made. Waiver not granted * must have an appropriate security clearance required for the MOS in which promotion is to be made; promotion may be made on the basis of an interim clearance c. Promotion to pay grades E-5 and E-6 – HQDA will announce each month by separate designation the promotion point cutoff scores for the primary and secondary zone lists for promotion to pay grades E-5 and E-6. * TIG and TIS requirements: For Promotion to Pay Grade Time in Grade Time in Service E-5 8 Months in E-4 (PZ) 36 Months (SZ) 24 Months E-6 10 Months in E-5 (PZ) 84* Months (SZ) 60 Months Note: The TIS criterion for promotion to grade E-6 is being phased from 72 to 84 months during the period 1 January 1977 through June 1978 as outlined in the Department of the Army MSG 231953Z December 1976, Subject: Interim Change to Chapter 7, Army Regulation 600-200. In addition, during this period the promotion point cutoff score letter will be used to confirm the required TIS criterion for promotion consideration/eligibility for a specific month. * be in a promotable status; waivers are not granted, * receive recommendation or concurrence in recommendation from unit commander; waivers are not granted, * individuals recommended for promotion to pay grades E-5 or E-6 will be required to appear in person for selection board evaluation. Appearance before a local selection board is authorized as follows: To Grade Board Appearance not earlier than Promotion not earlier than E-5 33 Months (PZ) 21 Months (AZ) 36 Months (PZ) 24 Months (SZ) E-6 81 Months (PZ)* 57 Months (SZ) 84 Months (PZ)* 60 Months (SZ) Note: Individual must meet the minimum TIG prior to board appearance. *The TIS criterion for board appearance to grade E-6 is being phased from 72 to 84 months during the period 1 Jan 77 through June 1978 as outlined in DA MSG 231953Z December 1976, Subject: Interim Change to Chapter 7, Army Regulation 600-200. In addition, during this period the promotion point cutoff score letter will be used to confirm the required TIS criterion for board appearance for a specific month. Appearance before a local board 3 months before the minimum TIS requirement as indicated above is permitted to allow for reporting of promotion point scores to HQDA prior to actual eligibility for promotion to the recommended grade; waivers are not granted. * Soldiers who are qualified otherwise may compete for promotion only in the Soldier's current primary MOS or in an MOS which is the normal career progression for the Soldier's primary MOS * the commander's recommendation or approval of such recommendation constitutes affirmation by that commander that the Soldier is qualified fully in the recommended MOS to perform the duties if subsequently promoted to the higher grade; waivers are not granted * competent Skill Level for next higher above that equivalent to his/her current grade in his/her MOS; waivers are not granted * be physically qualified; waivable * completion of eighth grade or GED equivalent for promotion to pay grade E-5; waivers not granted * for E-6, must have appropriate security clearance required by the MOS for which promotion is being made; waivers not granted * a precondition service obligation is established as 3 months for promotion to pay grade E-5 and 12 months for promotion to E-6; waivers will not be granted. d. Promotion to SFC/E-7. Headquarters, Department of the Army, will publish orders announcing promotions to grades E-7, E-8, and E-9. Dates of rank will be established in order of seniority (sequence numbers as shown on recommended list) over the days of the preceding month. Effective date of promotion for pay purposes will be the date of the promotion order unless a future effective date is specified in the order. * individuals promoted to grade E-7, E-8, and E-9 will incur a 2-year service obligation unless they have completed 30 or more years of active Federal service, * are already eligible through prior service for a higher grade at the time of retirement, or * age 55 or older 3. Army Regulation 672-5-1, chapter 5-10 (Expert Field Medical Badge). This badge recognizes Army personnel for attaining a high state of technical skill in field medical functions. It is awarded based on proven skill and performance. Eligibility Requirements: Enlisted personnel must have an Army Medical Department (AMEDD) primary MOS. This includes all MOS in a Career Management Field (CMF) 91 as well as MOS 76J and 94F. Eligible personnel must be on active duty-or assigned to a troop program unit in the Reserve Components or an AMEDD mobilization designee. Prior to being awarded the badge, personnel must successfully pass all test parts prescribed by Army Regulation 672-10 (Expert Field Medical Badge Test). Commanders with capabilities to conduct all test phases prescribed by Army Regulation 672-10 are authorized to give the test and award the badge. 4. Army Regulation 600-37 states, this regulation sets forth policies and procedures to authorize placement of unfavorable information about Army members in individual official personnel files. The objectives of this regulation are to apply fair and just standards to all Soldiers, protect the rights of individual Soldiers and, at the same time, permit the Army to consider all available relevant information when choosing Soldiers for positions of leadership, trust, and responsibility. This objective of this regulations is also to prevent adverse personnel action based on unsubstantiated derogatory information or mistaken identity and to provide a means of correcting injustices if they occur, and to ensure that Soldiers of poor moral character are not continued in the Service or advanced to positions of leadership, trust, and responsibility. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20170001662 7 1