ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 October 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20170005323 APPLICANT REQUESTS: correction of the records of her former husband’s records, a former service member (FSM) Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election to show former spouse coverage. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Former Spouse Statement * Letter of Support (2) * Divorce Decree * Death Certificate * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * DA Form 2339 (Application for Voluntary Retirement) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552(b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states she sent the paperwork in time, however, it was returned undeliverable. 3. The applicant provides the above referenced documents to include: a. A statement which states she was married to the FSM for 16 years during his Army career. When they separated, a judge in granted her his SBP benefits. She claims that she was denied her now deceased husband’s SBP benefits because she failed to submit a deemed election form. She contends that she was unware that she was required to submit the form. She suffers from mental health issues and has been forced to leave her home after the alimony stopped when the FSM died. b. A letter of support from First Fruit Ministries, a traditional housing organization, dated 30 May 2016, which states the applicant is a resident of the program for homeless women and children. c. A letter of support from her daughter which she shared with FSM, which was notarized on 25 May 2016, which states her mother was married to her father throughout his military career. Also, her mother suffers from severe mental health conditions and the prescribed medications makes her confused and at times, unable to comprehend the situation. She adds that her father handled all military matters and her mother has been evicted due to the loss of her father’s retirement pay. d. A divorce decree, dated 2 July 2004, from the state of , which states the applicant was lawfully married to the FSM on 15 May 1983 and separated in October 1999. It shows his surviving spouse as X__ X__. e. A death certificate dated 29 Aug 2013, from the state of , which certified the FSM died on 24 August 2013. 4. A review of the FSM’s service record shows: a. He entered active duty on 23 July 1976. b. In conjunction with retirement processing, on 3 March 1998, he signed and completed a DD Form 2656, which shows in: * block 22 (spouse name): X_X_ * block 25 (date of marriage): ## May 198# * block 28 (beneficiary category): I elect coverage for spouse only * block 29 (level of coverage): I elect basic coverage based on full gross pay plus supplemental coverage but checked “none” for the percentage. 5. According to his DD Form 214, he was honorably retired for sufficient service for retirement on 31 May 1998. 6. The court order, Separation Agreement, signed by the FSM and former spouse, X__X__ on 2 April 2002, which outlined “post separation support” is not available for the Board to review. 7. By law, a spouse becomes an eligible spouse beneficiary under SBP upon the one year anniversary of marriage and, if so eligible, becomes entitled to the spouse annuity upon the death of the retired Soldier. 8. By law, SBP passes by category not by name. Former spouse coverage under SBP may be voluntarily initiated by the Soldier or court-ordered. If court-ordered, the former spouse may request a former spouse coverage election be deemed to have been made. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board found relief was not warranted. The applicant’s contentions were carefully considered. The court-order showing the FSM was to name the applicant the former spouse on the SBP was not available for the Board to review. The FSM’s death certificate shows he was married to a person other than the applicant at his time of death. The Board agreed the applicant did not provide evidence showing the widow relinquished interest in the SBP, and therefore, deny the requested relief. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING X X X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. X CHAIRPERSON Signed by: I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Record (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Title 10, USC, section 1448, establishes the SBP. It essentially states, in pertinent part, that eligible participants include persons entitled to retired pay and persons who would be eligible for reserve-component retired pay but for the fact that they are under 60 years of age. A standard annuity participant is a person who is entitled to retired pay and who is married or has a dependent child when he becomes entitled to retired pay, unless he elects (with his spouse’s concurrence) not to participate in the Plan before the first day for which he is eligible for that pay. A person who is a participant in the Plan and is providing coverage for a spouse or spouse and child and who has a former spouse who was not that person’s former spouse when that person became eligible to participate in the Plan, may elect to provide an annuity to that former spouse. Any such election must be written, signed by the person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within one year after the date of the decree of divorce, dissolution, or annulment. A person who elects to provide an annuity to a former spouse shall, at the time of making the election, provide the Secretary concerned with a written statement (in a form to be prescribed by that Secretary and signed by such person and the former spouse) setting forth whether the election is being made pursuant to the requirements of a court order or whether the election is being made pursuant to a written agreement previously entered into voluntarily by such person as part of, or incident to, a proceeding of divorce, dissolution, or annulment, and (if so) whether such voluntary written agreement has been incorporated in or ratified or approved by, a court order. 3. Title 10, USC, section 1450, governs beneficiaries and payment of SBP annuities. It essentially states, in pertinent part, that if a Plan participant is required pursuant to a court order to provide an annuity to a former spouse and such person then fails or refuses to make such an election, such person shall be deemed to have made such an election if the Secretary concerned receives a written request, in such manner as the Secretary shall prescribe, from the former spouse concerned requesting that such an election be deemed to have been made. The request shall include either a copy of a court order, regular on its face, which requires such election or incorporates, ratifies, or approves the written agreement of such person, or a statement from the clerk of the court that such agreement has been filed with the court in accordance with applicable State law. An election may not be deemed to have been made in the case of any person unless the Secretary concerned receives a request from the former spouse of the person within one year of the date of the court order or filing involved. NOTHING FOLLOWS