ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 1 October 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20170014269 APPLICANT REQUESTS: an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to a general, under honorable conditions discharge. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant requests to have DD Form 214 changed to reflect a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 only states the code for his separation. 3. A review of the applicant’s service record shows: a. On 9 July 1999, he enlisted in the Regular Army. b. His DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows he completed basic training, but not advanced individual training as an 88M (Motor Transportation Specialist). c. On 13 December 1999, the commander notified the applicant he was initiating separation of him under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct) for his failure and/or inability to adapt to a military environment. On 13 December 1999, he acknowledged receipt. d. On 13 December 1999, the applicant waived his right to consult with an attorney concerning the separation proceedings pending against him. He acknowledged he had been advised of his right to submit a statement on his behalf and of his discharge and education benefits. e. On 14 December 1999, his immediate commander initiated separation of the applicant under AR 635-200, chapter 11. f. On 15 December 1999, the separation approval authority directed the applicant be separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 11, and be issued an uncharacterized discharge. g. On 16 December 1999, he was discharged from active duty under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 11. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 5 months and 8 days of active service. h. There is no evidence the applicant has applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for review of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. 4. By regulation (635-200), separation of a Soldier in entry level status may be warranted on grounds of unsatisfactory performance or unsatisfactory conduct (or both) as evidenced by inability, lack of reasonable effort, failure to adapt to the military environment, or minor disciplinary infractions. This policy applies to Soldiers who are in entry level status and, before the date of initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty (AD) or initial active duty training. Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous AD. 5. By regulation (635-5), the DD Form 214 is a summary of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of all current active, prior active, and prior inactive duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The information entered thereon reflects the conditions as they existed at the time of separation. 6. In reaching its determination, the Board can consider the applicant’s petition and his service record in accordance with the published equity, injustice, or clemency determination guidance. BOARD DISCUSSION: After review of the application and all evidence, the Board determined there is insufficient evidence to grant relief. The governing regulation provides that a separation will be described as uncharacterized, if the separation action is initiated within the first 180 days of active duty service. As such, his DD Form 214 properly shows his service as uncharacterized. An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service. It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise. As a result, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :X :X :X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Chapter 11 (Entry Level Performance and Conduct) states separation of a Soldier in entry level status may be warranted on grounds of unsatisfactory performance or unsatisfactory conduct (or both) as evidenced by inability, lack of reasonable effort, failure to adapt to the military environment, or minor disciplinary infractions. This policy applies to Soldiers who are in entry level status and, before the date of initiation of separation action, have completed no more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty (AD) or initial active duty training. Entry level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous AD. b. Paragraph 3-7a (Honorable Discharge) states an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. c. Paragraph 3-7b (General Discharge) states a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory by not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. d. Paragraph 3-9 (Uncharacterized Separations) states a separation will be described as an entry level separation with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in entry level status. 3. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations – Separation Documents), in effect at the time, prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. Paragraph 2-4h (24) (Completing the DD Form 214), states characterization or description of service is determined by directives authorizing separation. 4. On 25 July 2018, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness issued guidance to Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) regarding equity, injustice, or clemency determinations. Clemency generally refers to relief specifically granted from a criminal sentence. BCM/NRs may grant clemency regardless of the type of court-martial. However, the guidance applies to more than clemency from a sentencing in a court- martial; it also applies to other corrections, including changes in a discharge, which may be warranted based on equity or relief from injustice. This guidance does not mandate relief, but rather provides standards and principles to guide Boards in application of their equitable relief authority. In determining whether to grant relief based on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds, BCM/NRs shall consider the prospect for rehabilitation, external evidence, sworn testimony, policy changes, relative severity of misconduct, mental and behavioral health conditions, official governmental acknowledgement that a relevant error or injustice was committed, and uniformity of punishment. Changes to the narrative reason for discharge and/or an upgraded character of service granted solely on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds normally should not result in separation pay, retroactive promotions, and payment of past medical expenses or similar benefits that might have been received if the original discharge had been for the revised reason or had the upgraded service characterization. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20170014269 5 1