ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 August 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20170014745 APPLICANT REQUESTS: an upgrade of his characterization on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Orders for Advanced Individual Training * DA Form 664 (Service Member’s Statement concerning Compensation from the Veterans Administration) * Army National Guard Current Annual Statement * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states he would like his character of service upgraded. He is a federal technician for the Montana Army National Guard and changing the status on his DD Form 214 would benefit him towards retirement and correct the buyback of his active time towards retirement. 3. The applicant provides: * orders reflecting report date for training * DA Form 664 showing that he has not filed an application for compensation * a copy of his Army National Guard Current Annual Statement * DD Form 214 releasing him from active duty training with an uncharacterized character of service 4. A review of the applicant’s service record shows: a. He enlisted in the Army National Guard on 4 December 1987. b. He attended and completed active duty training from 14 June 1988 to 20 October 1988. c. His DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 20 October 1988 and issued a uncharacterized, character of service. He completed 4 months and 7 days of net active service during this period. He was authorized or awarded the: * Army Service Ribbon * Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge Grenade 5. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an update of his discharge. 6. By regulation, Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and United States Army Reserve (USAR) soldiers who successfully complete a period of initial active duty training (IADT) to which ordered, will out-process per AR 612-201. The service of soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in entry level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IADT successfully. 7. The Board can consider the applicant’s petition and his service record in accordance with the published equity, injustice, or clemency determination guidance. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, to include the DoD guidance on liberal consideration when reviewing discharge upgrade requests, the Board determined that relief was warranted. Based upon a documentary review of the applicant’s military record, the Board concluded that the applicant completed a period of active duty while conducting initial entry training (IET). He was awarded a MOS at the completion of IET and was transferred back to the ARNG. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that when a RC Soldier successfully completes IADT, the character of service is Honorable unless directed otherwise by the separation authority. Based upon regulatory guidance, the Board agreed the DD Form 214 should show his character of service as Honorable. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 X X X GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING : : : DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by reissuing the applicant a DD Form 214 showing his characterization of service as Honorable. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), in effect at the time, sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the soldier's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that' any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization. It will not be issued to soldiers upon separation at expiration of their period of enlistment, military service obligation, or period for which called or ordered to active duty. c. Chapter 4 (Separation for Expiration of Service Obligation) of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a soldier will be separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation. d. Paragraph 4-2 Discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment, and other periods of active duty or active duty for training). e. Paragraph 4-2h Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) and United States Army Reserve (USAR) soldiers who successfully complete a period of initial active duty training (IADT) to which ordered, will out-process per AR 612-201. The service of soldiers specified in this paragraph who are in entry level status will be uncharacterized, even though they have completed their IADT successfully. f. Paragraph 4-4 (Characterization of Service) states in pertinent part, that a soldier being separated upon expiration of enlistment or fulfillment of service obligation will be awarded a character of service of honorable, unless the soldier is in entry level status and service is uncharacterized. 3. On 25 July 2018, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness issued guidance to Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) regarding equity, injustice, or clemency determinations. Clemency generally refers to relief specifically granted from a criminal sentence. BCM/NRs may grant clemency regardless of the type of court-martial. However, the guidance applies to more than clemency from a sentencing in a court-martial; it also applies to other corrections, including changes in a discharge, which may be warranted based on equity or relief from injustice. This guidance does not mandate relief, but rather provides standards and principles to guide Boards in application of their equitable relief authority. In determining whether to grant relief based on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds, BCM/NRs shall consider the prospect for rehabilitation, external evidence, sworn testimony, policy changes, relative severity of misconduct, mental and behavioral health conditions, official governmental acknowledgement that a relevant error or injustice was committed, and uniformity of punishment. Changes to the narrative reason for discharge and/or an upgraded character of service granted solely on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds normally should not result in separation pay, retroactive promotions, and payment of past medical expenses or similar benefits that might have been received if the original discharge had been for the revised reason or had the upgraded service characterization. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20170014745 3 1