ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 October 20190 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20170017283 APPLICANT REQUESTS: correction of his period of service from1985 to 1992 and the character of his discharge. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552(b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states he needs his time from 1985 to 1992 put on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) 3. A review of the applicant’s service records shows: a. He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 30 October 1984. b. He entered active duty for training (ADT) on 10 January 1985 and completed required training for award of military occupational specialty (MOS) 31E (Combat Signaler). c. He was released from ADT in accordance with chapter 4 of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations) on 1 June 1985 due to expiration of term of service (ETS). His DD Form 214 shows his character of service as "entry level status" and that he completed 4 months and 22 days of active service. d. Following his release from active duty, he was assigned to the 192nd Supply Company in Houston, TX, and then the 441st Signal Transportation Company, Houston. e. Between December 1991 and April 1992, he accrued at least 8 unexcused absences from unit training assemblies. f. On 27 July 1992, his chain of command received formal notification the applicant tested positive for illegal drugs. g. On 4 August 1992, the applicant's immediate commander, initiated a Bar to Reenlistment Certificate against him, citing his positive urinalysis test. h. Also on 4 August 1992, his immediate commander advised the applicant of his intent to initiate separation action against him in accordance with chapter 7 (Misconduct) of AR 135-178 (Enlisted Administrative Separations). The applicant acknowledged receipt and understood his rights. i. On 3 September 1992, the applicant signed a statement indicating his desire to be voluntarily discharged from the USAR effective 1 October 1992 or upon hi ETS date. j. On 27 September 1992, the immediate commander, initiated separation action against the applicant for misconduct (positive drug use). He recommended the applicant be separated on his ETS date (29 October 1992) and his service be characterized as general, under honorable conditions. k. On 14 October 192, the intermediate commander recommended approval of the discharge action with the issuance of a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. He described the applicant as a consistently marginal performer and recommended he be separated on his ETS date. l. On 9 December 1992, Headquarters, U.S. Army Reserve m, Fort McPherson, GA published Orders 05-142 ordering his discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve with an honorable characterization of service, effective 9 December 1992. m. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for review of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations. n. Aside from his 4 months and 22 days of active service for which a DD Form 214 was issued there is no evidence he performed any other period of active duty of at least 90 consecutive days which would have qualified him for the issuance of a DD Form 214. 4. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. The applicant's service in the USAR from 1985 to 1992 was not active duty. 5. During the first 180 days of continuous active military service, a member's service is under review. When separated within the first 180 days, service is usually not characterized unless the circumstances of the separation warrant an under other than honorable conditions discharge. An honorable characterization may be given only if the service clearly warrants that characterization by unusual circumstances of personal conduct and performance of military duty and the characterization must be approved by The Secretary of the Army. 6. An uncharacterized discharge is neither positive nor negative; it is not "derogatory." An uncharacterized character of service is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service. It merely means that the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his/her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise. 7. By regulation (AR 135-178), USAR enlisted Soldier will be discharged for a variety of reasons, including misconduct (chapter 7). The separation authority will determine the characterization of service. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board found the relief was warranted. The applicant’s contentions were carefully considered. He completed a period of active duty while conducting initial entry training (IET). He was awarded a MOS at the completion of IET and was transferred back to the USAR. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that when a RC Soldier successfully completes IADT, the character of service is Honorable unless directed otherwise by the separation authority. Based upon regulatory guidance, the Board agreed the DD Form 214 should show his character of service as Honorable. Adding the additional period of service is denied as it occurred after the period of active service covered by the DD Form 214 when he was transferred back to the USAR. The Board wished to inform the applicant that only active duty service is reflected on a DD Form 214; any duty in the USAR is not appropriate for reflection on a DD Form 214 per regulatory guidance. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF X X X GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING : : : DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by reissuing him a DD Form 214 for the period ending 1 June 1985 showing his character of service as Honorable. 2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to adding additional service dates to his DD Form 214. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations) describes the different types of characterization of service. It states: a. An uncharacterized separation is an entry-level separation. A separation will be described as an entry-level separation if processing is initiated while a member is in entry-level status, except when characterization under other than honorable condition is authorized under the reason for separation and is warranted by the circumstances of the case or when The Secretary of the Army, on a case-by-case basis, determines that characterization of service as honorable is clearly warranted by the presence of unusual circumstances involving personal conduct and performance of duty. For Regular Army Soldiers, entry-level status is the first 180 days of continuous active duty or the first 180 days of continuous active duty following a break in service of more than 92 days of active military service. b. An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. 3. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge, and is not intended to have any legal effect on termination of a Soldier's service. A DD Form 214 will be prepared for each Soldier as indicated: a. Active Army Soldiers on termination of active duty by reason of administrative separation (including separation by reason of retirement or expiration of term of service), physical disability separation, or punitive discharge under the Uniform Code of Military Justice; b. Reserve Component (RC) Soldiers completing 90 days or more of continuous ADT, Full-Time National Guard Duty, active duty for special work, temporary tours of active duty, or Active Guard Reserve service. Also, RC Soldiers separated for cause or physical disability regardless of the length of time served on active duty; c. Army National Guard (ARNG) and USAR Soldiers mobilized under Title 10, U.S. Code, sections 12301(a), 12302, or 12304, and ARNG Soldiers called into Federal service under Title 10, U.S. Code, chapter 15 or section 12406, regardless of length of mobilization, when transitioned from active duty. A Soldier who reports to a mobilization station and is found unqualified for active duty will be excluded from this provision. He or she will only receive a DD Form 220 (Active Duty Report); and d. RC Soldiers completing initial ADT that results in the award of an MOS even when the active duty period was less than 90 days. This includes completion of advanced individual training under the ARNG of the United States Alternate Training Program or USAR Split Training Program. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20170017283 5 1