ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 14 April 2020 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2018001661 APPLICANT REQUESTS: reinstatement of her Non-Prior Service bonus. APPLICANT’S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Request for Exception to Policy (ETP) * Bonus Addendum * National Guard Bureau (NGB) ETP * Personnel Action FACTS: 1. The applicant states she enlisted in the military occupational specialty (MOS) of 25C in 2013 accepting a bonus of $20,000. Since her enlistment, she's reached the limits of her promotion possibilities. There is not a Sergeant (SGT)/E-5 slot for 25C in any unit in the state of Montana. She submitted an ETP to NGB requesting to change her MOS from 25C to a 68W with multiple lanes for upward progression. The ETP was denied. She is requesting reversal of the decision made on the ETP. The ETP was unjust because she is a Soldier in good standing and completed all requirements for promotion to SGT. She was selected for promotion as a 68W. She planned to reenlist and wants to look forward to career progression before her first enlistment was over. 2. The applicant's service records contain the following documents for the Board's consideration: a. Orders 288-003, published by Joint Force Headquarters, Montana, dated 15 October 2018, which shows she was promoted to the rank of SGT effective 13 October 2018 in the MOS 68W. b. A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 6 November 2019, which shows she was placed in an excess position duty to no fault of her own. c. A DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 18 January 2019, which shows the applicant reenlisted for 6 years. Her new expiration term of service was 18 November 2025. 3. The applicant provides, the following documents for the Board's consideration: a. A self-authored letter, dated 9 June 2017, which states she is requesting an ETP to change her MOS from 25C to 68W. She did not have a reservation to attend the 68W MOS school; however, she would reserve a training seat upon approval of her ETP. She met the physical demands rating and qualifications for award of the MOS. She met the minimum aptitude scores in the areas needed for the MOS. Her reason for the request was there were no opportunities for her in the 25C MOS for career progression in the Montana Army National Guard (ARNG). b. A Non-Prior Service Bonus Addendum, dated 19 November 2013, which shows: * she enlisted in the MOS of 25C * she enlisted for 6 years * she was to receive a bonus of $20,000 * her bonus would be terminated if she voluntarily changed her MOS during the contractual obligation c. A memorandum from NGB subject request for ETP, dated 3 November 2017, which states the ETP to retain the $20,000 bonus was disapproved for the discrepancy of voluntarily transferring out of the contracted MOS. d. A DA Form 4187, dated 14 December 2016 requesting to change her MOS from 25C to 68W, which was signed by the applicant and her commander. 4. See below for references. BOARD DISCUSSION: 1. The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request, supporting documents and evidence in the records. The Board considered the applicant’s statement, her record of service, the terms of her contracted incentive, her requested MOS change and the denial of an exception to policy by the NGB. The Board found insufficient evidence to support the applicant’s statement that her change in MOS was involuntary due to unit actions, but considered her continuing service in the ARNG. Based on a preponderance of evidence, the Board determined that the denial of the applicant’s requested incentive was not in error or unjust, but that she should not be held responsible for any recoupment. 2. After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board found that partial relief was warranted. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF :X :X :X GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING : : : DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to relieve the applicant of any recoupment associated with her non-prior service enlistment bonus dated 19 November 2013. 2. The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to reinstatement of the applicant’s eligibility for a non-prior service enlistment bonus. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.? REFERENCES: 1. Army National Guard Selected Reserve Incentive Program Policy for Fiscal Year (FY) 2013, (Policy Number 13-01), dated 29 November 2012, states the Soldier must serve satisfactorily in the contracted MOS for the full term of the service agreement. 2. Department of Defense Instruction 1205.21 (Reserve Component Incentive Programs Procedures), states in paragraph 6.8.3 if a Soldier moves to a non-bonus skill or unit, unless the move is required by the Reserve component their bonus would be terminated. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR2018001661 3