IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 November 2020 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20180008756 APPLICANT REQUESTS: cancellation of his debt to the Government in the amount of $24,712.28 for overpayment of Basic Pay, Basic Housing Allowance (BAH) and Cost of Living Allowance (COLA) and a personal appearance. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Memorandum – Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) to Congresswomen * Memorandum – Congressional Inquiry to Congresswomen * Memorandum - Notification of Debt Collection, dated 3 May 2017 * Email correspondence ( 6 pages) * Orders 065-044 – Active Duty Training (ADT) dated 10 April 2015 * Army National Guard Annual Statement * Orders 005-048 – Discharge effective 28 December 2017 FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code, section 1552(b); however, the ABCMR conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states in effect, that he is requesting total forgiveness of a Defense Finance Accounting Service (DFAS) debt in the total of $24,712.28. This debt was wrongfully placed on him by a clerical error and he attempted to correct the issue when first discovered. The debt balance is not accurate and he was never paid regular drill pay or annual training pay during the time he was receiving the active pay. He is being charged for monies that were paid to him for an entire permanent change of station (PCS) move back and forth from. He did a do-it-yourself (DITY) move and was authorized full PCS entitlements that have now been lumped into the debt amount. He did not benefit financially from this incident and have no way to pay off this excessive debt. He is being punished by a clerical error that was of no fault of his own. He attempted on multiple occasions to correct this issue at his unit level and was met with incompetence. He is a disabled veteran and this situation has put an extreme economic hardship on him and his family. 3. The applicant provides: a. A copy of his Congressional Inquiry to Congresswomen requesting her assistance. The applicants request states in part, that he was honorably discharged in December 2016. His issue involves overpayment from active duty orders he received for training in 2015. He moved from to and his orders were later cancelled one week later. He returned to and continued drill with his National Guard unit. He noticed he was being overpaid and contacted his unit readiness officer to let them know what was going on. (see attached) b. A copy of DFAS response to Congresswoman on behalf of the applicant concerning his indebtedness with the Department of Defense. It states in part that the applicant incurred a valid debt of $24,712.28, due to an overpayment of entitlements. (see attached). c. A copy his indebtedness letter from DFAS, dated 3 May 2017 informing his they are responsible for collecting his individual debts owed to the United States Government by former DoD employees, service members, or other debtors. It asks the applicant to pay his debt in full within 30 days from the date of the letter. It also instructs the applicant of what could be done if he is unable to make full payment. (see attached). d. A copy of email correspondence between and the applicant where he is informing them that he believes he’s being paid as if he was still on active duty. e. A copy of orders 065-044 dated 10 April 2015, active duty for training (ADT) for the period 24 April 2015 – 25 November 2015 plus allowable travel time. f. A copy of Army National Guard annual statement to show the his service time in the Delayed Entry Program, Regular Army Service, Army National Guard Unit Member, Army National Guard Active Guard Reserve (AGR) 4. A review of the applicant’s service record shows: a. He had prior enlisted service in the Regular Army and joined the Army National Guard (AGR) on 15 May 2013 in the rank/grade of Specialist/E4. b. Based on demotion orders, #160-001, dated 8 June 2008, the applicant was demoted to Staff Sergeant (SSG)/E6, effective 6 June 2008. c. Based on promotion orders, #292-020, dated 21 October 2008, the applicant was promoted to the Sergeant First Class (SFC)/E7 effective 7 October 2008. d. The applicant was discharged on 28 December 2016. His DD Form 214 shows he had sufficient service for retirement and was discharged with an honorable characterization of service, under provisions of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-5, Chapter 6 (Separations). He completed 15 years, 8 months and 19 days of active service. 5. On 2 July 2018, Case Management Division (CMD) Army Review Board Agency, acknowledge receipt of the applicants Application for Correction of Military Records. 6. On 27 February 2020, CMD Army Review Board Agency requested an advisory opinion for recoupment of pay and allowances with a suspense of 30 March 2020. 7. By regulation, Army Regulation (AR) 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness), a soldier indebted to the U.S. Government may request that the debt be remitted or canceled on the basis of hardship, injustice, or both. 8. In reaching its determination, the Board can consider the applicant’s petition and his service record in accordance with the published equity, injustice, or clemency determination guidance. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board determined it could reach a fair and equitable decision in the case without a personal appearance by the applicant. The Board also determined relief was not warranted. Based upon the available documentation, the Board concluded there was insufficient evidence to show that he applicant’s DFAS debt was placed into effect in error; therefore, the Board concluded there was insufficient evidence of an error or injustice which would warrant a change to the applicant’s military pay record. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :X :X :X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation (AR) 600-4 (Remission or Cancellation of Indebtedness), in effect at the time, provides policies and guidance for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the U.S. Army. a. Paragraph 1-12 states the regulation determines injustice and hardship based on the information received and considers factors such as: * the Army’s policy in the area of indebtedness to the U.S. Army * the soldier’s awareness of policy and procedures * the soldier’s monthly income and expenses * the soldier’s contribution to the indebtedness to the U.S. Army by not having the situation corrected b. Paragraph 1-13 states the application must contain evidence that the applicant did not know or could not have known of error and the applicant inquired of a proper authority and was told the payment was correct. c. Chapter 1 of this regulation provides instructions for submitting and processing applications for remission or cancellation of indebtedness to the U.S. Army. Applications must be based on injustice, hardship, or both. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20180008756 5 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1