IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 November 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20190003333 APPLICANT REQUESTS: Correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), for the period ending 5 May 1997, as follows: * amend Item 24 (Character of Service) to show his service was characterized as honorable * amend item 26 (Separation Code) to show a different separation code, consistent with a separation for the convenience of the government * amend item 27 (Reentry (RE) Code) to show his RE code was "1" * amend item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) to show he was separated for the "Convenience of the Government" APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552), dated 21 January 2019 * four pages of service medical records FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), Section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states he had been sick with pneumonia while in basic training and was unable to pass the Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFT). At the time of his discharge, he was informed that because of his hardship, his discharge status would become honorable after 90 days. He met with a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) representative to get a copy of his DD Form 214 (showing an honorable status) and was told he had to request a correction of his military record. 3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 November 1996. 4. The applicant's service medical record shows he was treated on 3 December 1996, for an upper respiratory infection with productive cough; on 29 January 1997, for left knee pain; on 12 February 1997, for the flu; and on 26 February 1997, for bronchitis. 5. The applicant was transferred from basic reconnaissance training to the fitness training unit on 27 March 1997. 6. The applicant was counseled on 28 March 1997 in reference to his inability to pass the APFT over four consecutive tests. 7. The applicant failed the Expanded Fitness Training Program and was returned to his unit on 16 April 1997. 8. The applicant's unit commander initiated separation processing on 18 April 1997, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), Chapter 11, due to the applicant's inability to pass the minimum standards required of the APFT. He acknowledged the proposed separation on 25 April 1997. After consulting with counsel, he waived his right to make a statement in his own behalf. 9. The separation authority approved the recommendation on 30 April 1997 and directed the applicant's separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11. 10. The applicant was discharged on 5 May 1997, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11. His DD Form 214 shows he was credited with completing five months and five days of net active service and he was not awarded a military occupational specialty. His DD Form 214 further shows the following entries in: * Item 24, his service was uncharacterized * Item 26, his separation code was "JGA" * Item 27, his RE code was "3" * Item 28, his narrative reason for separation was "Entry Level Performance and Conduct" 11. There is not now nor has there ever been any law or regulation that authorizes an automatic upgraded of any type of discharge. BOARD DISCUSSION: 1. The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request, supporting documents, evidence in the records, regulatory requirements, and published DoD guidance for consideration of discharge upgrade requests. The Board found the character of service equitable under the circumstances. Based on a preponderance of evidence, the Board determined that there was no error or injustice in the applicant’s discharge or character of service, or basis for clemency. 2. After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board found that relief was not warranted. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :X :X :X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. 3. Army Regulation 601-210 (Regular Army and Army Reserve Enlistment Program) provides the eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing into the Regular Army and USAR. It provides that individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge prior to discharge or release from active duty. Table 3-1 includes a list of Regular Army RE codes. * RE code "1" applies to Soldiers completing their term of active service who are considered qualified to reenter the U.S. Army; they are qualified for enlistment if all other criteria are met * RE code "3" applies to Soldiers who are not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waivable; they are ineligible unless a waiver is granted * RE code "4" applies to Soldiers separated from their last period of service with a non-waivable disqualification 4. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides that separation codes are three-character alphabetic combinations that identify reasons for and types of separation from active duty. Separation code narrative reasons are aligned with applicable regulatory authority paragraphs. The separation code "JGA" is the appropriate code to assign Soldiers separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 11, by narrative reason of "Entry Level Performance and Conduct." 5. The SPD/RE Code Cross Reference Table provides instructions for determining the applicable RE code for separating Regular Army and Reserve Component Soldiers. This cross reference table shows the separation code and corresponding RE code. The table in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge shows that separation code "JGA" was assigned a corresponding RE code of "3." 6. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. An honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. b. A general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization. c. Chapter 11 of that regulation provides for the separation of personnel in an entry level status for unsatisfactory performance or conduct as evidenced by inability, lack of reasonable effort or a failure to adapt to the military environment. These provisions apply only to individuals whose separation processing is started within 180 days of entry into active duty. An uncharacterized separation is mandatory under this chapter. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20190003333 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20190003333 5 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20190003333 4