ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2019 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20190004370 APPLICANT REQUESTS: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record Under the Provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, U.S. Code (USC), Section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant provides no statement in support of his requested upgrade. 3. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 March 1995. 4. The applicant tested positive for marijuana use between 15 September 1996 and 15 October 1996. 5. The applicant received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 3 December 1995, under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for wrongfully using marijuana between 15 September 1996 and 15 October 1996. 6. The applicant was afforded a mental status evaluation on 12 March 1997 that found he met the diagnostic criteria for substance abuse (cannabis) but otherwise cleared him for any administrative actions deemed appropriate. 7. The applicant's unit commander notified the applicant on 1 April 1997 of his intent to initiate actions to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c, by reason of his commission of a serious offense. The applicant was advised of the basis for the contemplated discharge, his options and rights, and the possible effects of an under honorable conditions discharge. He acknowledged the notification on 1 April 1997; however, his elections vis-à-vis his rights are not available for review. 8. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge on 1 April 1997, under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, based on his commission of a serious offense and directed that the applicant be discharged and be issued a General Discharge Certificate. 9. The applicant was discharged on 6 May 1997. The DD Form 214 he was issued shows he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct, and his service characterization was under honorable conditions (general). His DD Form 214 further shows he was discharged in the rank/grade of private/E-2 following 2 years, 1 months, and 16 days of creditable service. He was not credited with any awards or decorations. 10. The Board should consider the applicant's overall record in accordance with the published equity, injustice, or clemency determination guidance. BOARD DISCUSSION: 1. The Board carefully considered the applicant’s request, supporting documents, evidence in the records and published DOD guidance for consideration of discharge upgrade requests. The Board discussed the applicant’s record of service, the frequency and nature of his misconduct, the character of service he received and whether to apply clemency. The Board determined that there were insufficient mitigating factors in the record to overcome his misconduct, the applicant provided no additional post-service factors for consideration, and the character of service he received at discharge was not in error or unjust. 2. After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, the Board determined that relief was not warranted. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :x :x :x DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE(S): Not Applicable REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 15-185 (ABCMR) prescribes the policies and procedures for correction of military records by the Secretary of the Army, acting through the ABCMR. The regulation provides that the ABCMR begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. The applicant has the burden of proving an error or injustice by a preponderance of the evidence. 3. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier’s separation specifically allows such characterization. c. Paragraph 14-12c(2) states abuse of illegal drugs as serious misconduct. It continues; however, by recognizing that relevant facts may mitigate the nature of the offense. Therefore, a single drug abuse offense may be combined with one or more minor disciplinary infractions or incidents of other misconduct and processed for separation under paragraph 14-12a or 14-12b as appropriate. 4. The Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness issued guidance to Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records on 25 July 2018, regarding equity, injustice, or clemency determinations. Clemency generally refers to relief specifically granted from a criminal sentence. Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records may grant clemency regardless of the court-martial forum. However, the guidance applies to more than clemency from a sentencing in a court-martial; it also applies to any other corrections, including changes in a discharge, which may be warranted on equity or relief from injustice grounds. a. This guidance does not mandate relief, but rather provides standards and principles to guide Boards in application of their equitable relief authority. In determining whether to grant relief on the basis of equity, injustice, or clemency grounds, Boards shall consider the prospect for rehabilitation, external evidence, sworn testimony, policy changes, relative severity of misconduct, mental and behavioral health conditions, official governmental acknowledgement that a relevant error or injustice was committed, and uniformity of punishment. b. Changes to the narrative reason for discharge and/or an upgraded character of service granted solely on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds normally should not result in separation pay, retroactive promotions, and payment of past medical expenses or similar benefits that might have been received if the original discharge had been for the revised reason or had the upgraded service characterization. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20190004370 0 4 1