IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 3 November 2022 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20220006643 APPLICANT REQUESTS: an upgrade of his undesirable discharge. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * DD Form 149 (Application for the Correction of Military Record) * Three (3) DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) * NGB Form 22 (National Guard Bureau Report of Separation of Service in the Army National Guard of Wyoming and as a Reserve of the Army) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the three year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552 (b); however, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states, he had personal problems at the time with family. Prior to his discharge, he received two honorable discharges from the Wyoming Army National Guard and from Fort Richardson, Alaska. 3. The applicant provides: a. DD Form 214 shows he was honorably released to the Army National Guard (ARNG) of Wyoming on 15 January 1968, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), separation program number (SPN) 764, release of REP 63 trainees upon completion of MOS training. He served 3 months and 28 days of net service this period. b. NGB Form 22 shows he was honorably discharged on 28 May 1969, under the provisions of National Guard Regulation (NGR) 25-3, paragraph 4d, enlistment in U.S. Army. His length of this service was 1 year, 10 months, and 18 days. c. DD Form 214 shows he was honorably discharged on 18 March 1970, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, SPN 313, to immediately reenlist. He served 1 year, 10 months, and 8 days of net service this period. d. DD Form 214 shows he was discharged on 20 December 1972, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, SPN 246, for the good of the service, with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. He served 2 years, 1 month, and 24 days of net service this period. 4. A review of the applicant's service record shows: a. Following his discharge from the Wyoming Army National Guard, he enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 May 1969 for three years. On 19 March 1970, he reenlisted for 6 years. b. He accepted nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 27 September 1972, for absenting himself, without authority, from his unit from on or about 3 August 1971 until on or about 22 September 1971. He was reduced to specialist 4 (reduction suspended until 26 November 1971). c. On 27 October 1972, the applicant consulted with legal counsel. He was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and the procedures and rights that were available to him. Subsequent to receiving legal counsel, he voluntarily requested discharge under the provision of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), chapter 10, for the good of the service. In his request for discharge, he acknowledged his understanding that: * By requesting discharge, he was admitting guilt to the charge against him, or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of an undesirable discharge * He acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request was approved he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the Veterans Administration, and he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws * He was advised he could submit any statements he desired in his own behalf. * He elected not to submit any statements in his behalf d. The separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge on 13 November 1972, under the provisions of AR 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, and directed that an undesirable discharge certificate be furnished. e. The applicant was discharged on 20 December 1972, under the provisions of Army Regulation (AR) 635-200, SPN 246, for the good of the service, with a character of service of under other than honorable conditions. 5. AR 635-200, chapter 10, states a member who has committed an offense for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. 6. The Board should consider the applicant's submissions in accordance with the published equity, injustice, or clemency determination guidance. BOARD DISCUSSION: After reviewing the application and all supporting documents, to include the DoD guidance on liberal consideration when reviewing discharge upgrade requests, the Board determined relief was not warranted. Based upon the misconduct involved and the lack of any post-service character evidence to show the applicant has learned and grown from the time of separation, the Board concluded there was insufficient evidence of an error or injustice warranting a change to the characterization of service. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :xx :xx :xx DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within three years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the three-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. c. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. 3. On 25 July 2018, the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness issued guidance to Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records (BCM/NRs) regarding equity, injustice, or clemency determinations. Clemency generally refers to relief specifically granted from a criminal sentence. BCM/NRs may grant clemency regardless of the type of court-martial. However, the guidance applies to more than clemency from a sentencing in a court- martial; it also applies to other corrections, including changes in a discharge, which may be warranted based on equity or relief from injustice. This guidance does not mandate relief, but rather provides standards and principles to guide Boards in application of their equitable relief authority. In determining whether to grant relief based on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds, BCM/NRs shall consider the prospect for rehabilitation, external evidence, sworn testimony, policy changes, relative severity of misconduct, mental and behavioral health conditions, official governmental acknowledgement that a relevant error or injustice was committed, and uniformity of punishment. Changes to the narrative reason for discharge and/or an upgraded character of service granted solely on equity, injustice, or clemency grounds normally should not result in separation pay, retroactive promotions, and payment of past medical expenses or similar benefits that might have been received if the original discharge had been for the revised reason or had the upgraded service characterization. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20220006643 1 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1