IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 21 June 2023 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20220009597 APPLICANT REQUESTS: award of the Purple Heart. APPLICANT'S SUPPORTING DOCUMENT(S) CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD: * Two DD Forms 149 (Application for Correction of Military Record) * Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA) Letter * Standard Form 600 (Health Record – Chronological Record of Medical Care) * Two DD Forms 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) FACTS: 1. The applicant did not file within the 3-year time frame provided in Title 10, United States Code (USC), section 1552 (b) (Correction of Military Records: Claims Incident Thereto). However, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) conducted a substantive review of this case and determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. 2. The applicant states, during his Vietnam service, he sustained wounds caused by a U.S. grenade (i.e., friendly fire). They never awarded him the Purple Heart, but the applicant points out this occurred while he was on a patrol in enemy territory. In support of his request, he supplies copies of his DD Form 214 and the SF 600 associated with his wound's treatment. The medical document shows that, on 22 October 1968, medical authority treated the applicant after he had sustained a "frag wound 2° (secondary to) explosion of one of our own grenades...." 3. The applicant's service record is unavailable for review; the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) states another agency has checked out the applicant's records. However, the documents provided by the applicant offer sufficient information for a determination. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the following: a. On 6 March 1967, the applicant enlisted into the Regular Army for a 3-year term; the DD Form 214 lists his primary military occupational specialty as 76Y (Unit and Organizational Supply Specialist). On 27 June 1968, the applicant arrived in Vietnam; on 28 June 1968, he completed his tour, and orders reassigned him to a unit in the continental United States. On 5 March 1970, the Army honorably released the applicant from active duty and transferred him to the U.S. Army Reserve for the remainder of his military service obligation. b. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) lists the following: * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar * Two overseas service bars 4. The Vietnam Casualty Roster is a listing of Vietnam-era casualties commonly used to verify the entitlement to the award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's name is not reflected. 5. Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-22 (Military Awards), currently in effect, prescribes policies and procedures for the individual and unit military awards. a. Per paragraph 2-8 (Purple Heart), the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of the Armed Forces or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, died or sustained wounds as a result of hostile action. b. Paragraph 2-8b (8) states, "After 7 December 1941, pursuant to (Title) 10 USC 1129 (Purple Heart: Members Killed or Wounded in Action by Friendly Fire), as a result of friendly fire provided the member was killed or wounded in action by friendly weapon fire while directly engaged in armed conflict, other than the result of an act of an enemy of the United States, unless (in the case of a wound) the wound is the result of the willful misconduct of the member." c. Beyond showing that a Soldier sustained a wound or injury, approval of the Purple Heart requires substantiating evidence validating that the wound was serious enough to require treatment by medical personnel, and the medical personnel must have recorded the treatment as a matter of official record. BOARD DISCUSSION: 1. After reviewing the application, all supporting documents, and the evidence found within the military record, the Board found that relief was not warranted. The Board carefully considered the applicant's record of service, documents submitted in support of the petition and executed a comprehensive and standard review based on law, policy and regulation. Upon review of the applicant’s petition and available military records the Board determined there is no medical record showing the applicant received wounds caused by enemy forces that required treatment by medical personnel. The burden of proof rest on the applicant and the applicant provided no new evidence to support his claim for award of the Purple Heart. The Board agreed there was insufficient evidence that showed the applicant’s name on the casualty listing or notification to his family that he had been wounded. There is no medical record showing the applicant received wounds caused by enemy forces that required treatment by medical personnel. 2. Furthermore, the Board determined that no documentation or supporting statements indicated the applicant had loss of consciousness or restriction from full duty for a period greater than 48 hours due to persistent signs, symptoms, or physical finding of impaired brain function as specified in the criteria for award of the Purple Heart. Per the regulatory guidance on awarding the Purple Heart, the applicant must provide or have in his service records substantiating evidence to verify that he was injured, the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. Based on this, the Board denied relief. 3. Prior to closing the case, the Board did note the analyst of record administrative notes below, and recommended the correction is completed to more accurately depict the military service of the applicant. BOARD VOTE: Mbr 1 Mbr 2 Mbr 3 : : : GRANT FULL RELIEF : : : GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF : : : GRANT FORMAL HEARING :X :X :X DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: Except for the correction addressed in Administrative Note(s) below, the Board found the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ADMINISTRATIVE NOTE(S): 1. AR 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, stated the DD Form 214 was to list all decorations, service medals, campaign credits, and badges awarded or authorized. 2. AR 600-8-22 (Military Awards), currently in effect, states the Vietnam Service Medal is awarded to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States based on their qualifying service in Vietnam after 3 July 1965 through 28 March 1973; a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for the Soldier’s participation in each recognized campaign, including: * Counteroffensive, Phase IV (2 April 1968 to 30 June 1968) * Counteroffensive, Phase V (1 July 1968 to 1 November 1968) * Counteroffensive, Phase VI (2 November 1968 to 22 February 1969) * Tet 69/Counteroffensive (23 February 1969 to 8 June 1969) * Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969 (9 June 1969 to 31 October 1969) 3. Department of the Army Pamphlet (DA PAM) 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 8, dated 1974, awarded all units serving in Vietnam the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. 4. Based on the foregoing, amend the applicant's DD Form 214, ending 5 March 1970, as follows: a. Delete the Vietnam Service Medal. b. Add the following to item 24: * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation REFERENCES: 1. Title 10, USC, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the ABCMR to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. 2. AR 600-8-22, currently in effect, prescribes policies and procedures for the individual and unit military awards. a. Per paragraph 2-8 (Purple Heart), the Purple Heart is awarded in the name of the President of the United States to any member of the Armed Forces or any civilian national of the United States who, while serving under competent authority in any capacity with one of the U.S. Armed Services after 5 April 1917, died or sustained wounds as a result of hostile action. b. Paragraph 2-8b (8) states, "After 7 December 1941, pursuant to 10 USC 1129, as a result of friendly fire provided the member was killed or wounded in action by friendly weapon fire while directly engaged in armed conflict, other than the result of an act of an enemy of the United States, unless (in the case of a wound) the wound is the result of the willful misconduct of the member." c. Beyond showing that a Soldier sustained a wound or injury, approval of the Purple Heart required substantiating evidence that validated the wound resulted from hostile action, the wound/injury was serious enough to require treatment by medical personnel, and the medical personnel must have recorded the treatment as a matter of official record. //NOTHING FOLLOWS// ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20220009597 1 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1