PART II - APPLICATION DATA (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy) 1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions 2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 930527 3. Authority for separation: a. Regulation: Chapter 10, AR 635-200 b. Reason: For the Good of the Service-In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial 4. Prior review(s): Records/961112 PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations: ARCOM (3rd Awd) OSR (3) a. Period entered for: 6 Years AAM (3rd Awd) b. Entry date: 900620 GCMDL (6th Awd) c. Age: 35 Years DOB: 550112 NDSM (2) d. Educational level: HS Grad NCOPDR e. Aptitude area score: ASR GT: 125 3. Highest grade achieved: f. Length of Service: E7 2 Year(s) 11 Month(s) 8 Day(s) 4. Performance evaluations: See OMPF PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Periods of unauthorized absence: Status Inclusive dates AWOL Mil conf Civil conf Other 6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE Date Offense(s) 7. Court-Martial data: NONE a. SCM: Date Offense(s) b. SPCM: Date Offense(s) c. GCM: Date Offense(s) 8. Remarks: Applicant has a Letter of Debarment in file dated 930524. SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge RA 730918 760917 Honorable USARCG 760918 770914 NA RA 770915 820806 Honorable RA 820807 850218 Honorable RA 850219 900619 Honorable PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was charged with Larceny undated. On 6 May 1993, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily requested, in writing, discharge under the provisions of Chapter l0, AR 635-200 in lieu of trial by court-martial. In this request, the applicant admitted guilt to the offense, or a lesser included offense. Further, the applicant indicated that he understood that he could receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge and that the discharge would have a significant effect on eligibility for veteran’s benefits. The applicant submitted a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 13 May 1993, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank. b. On 27 May 1993, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 11 months, and 18 days of active military service in the period under review and had a total of 19 years, 8 months and 10 days of active military service. 2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l0 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The requests may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge UOHC is normally considered appropriate. SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293. 2. Exhibit(s) submitted: A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020705. A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable): b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable): PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits 1. Review/hearing information: a. Type requested: ( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing b. Type Held: ( )Records review ( X ) Hearing ( ) Tender Offer c. Review/hearing location and date: Tampa, FL on 5 November 2002. d. Appearance by: Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No Counsel ( X ) Yes ( ) No e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No f. Counsel presentation: ( X ) Yes ( ) No g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 7 documents. PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. ( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows: ( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows: Board Issue: (2) The discharge is inequitable. b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason 2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge. b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above. (2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and heard his testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board determined that the applicant provided credible mitigating evidence regarding the circumstances which led to his discharge. In addition, the Board found that the length and quality of the applicant’s service, to include his awards and record of promotions, mitigated his misconduct. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined that the discharge was inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable and to change the narrative reason for discharge to Secretarial Authority. This action entails a change in RE code to 1. (1) See Paragraph 3, below. 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered. PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. Board conclusion(s): The discharge was: ( X ) Proper. ( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                     . ( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                      . ( ) Equitable. ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable. ( X ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to Secretarial Authority under Chapter 5, AR 635-200. ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                         . 2. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 4 1 Characterization 5 0 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document. Department of the Army Review Boards Agency ATTN: Promulgation Team 1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor Arlington, VA 22202-4508 3. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified                            Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 12 November 2002 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s): ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable. ( X ) Change reason and authority for discharge to Secretarial Authority, AR 635-200. ( X ) Other (see remarks below). Remarks: Restore grade to sergeant first class/E-7; change RE code to 1. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: JOHN F. LONG Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR Number: 2002076287 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 021105 A9218 Character of Service: UD A1200 Date of Discharge: 930527 A9204 Authority: AR 635-200 C10 A9220 Reason: A7200 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 4-1 A PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name  Reason Characterization CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR 1. LTC LONG, JOHN Mbr      X      X        2. Mbr  X     X            3. COL MINNIEFIELD, ANITA R. Mbr  X     X            4. Mbr  X     X            5. PO  X     X