Application Receipt Date: 060411 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 with attached statement II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Yes No Tender Offer: ????? See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 000201 Discharge Received: Date: 000314 Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: Company B, 801st Maintenance Support Battalion, Division Support Command, 101st Airborne Division (Air Assault), Fort Campbell, KY 42223 Time Lost: AWOL, for a total of 21 days from (980513-980631), see DA Form 2-1, item 21 Time Lost. The DD Form 214 item 29, does not reflect this period of AWOL. Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 991201, Wrongfully possess some amount of marijuana on or about (980701-990731), wrongfully possess some amount of cocaine (990501-990531), wrongfully used cocaine on or about (990501-990531), wrongfully possess some amount of cocaine on or about (990701-990731), wrongfully used cocaine on or about (990701-990731), wrongfully possess some amount of crystal methamphetamine on or about (971201-991231), wrongfully used crystal methamphetamine on or about (971201-991231), wrongfully possess some amount of Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) on or about (980701-980731), wrongfully used Lysergic Acid Diethylamide (LSD) (980701-980731), and wrongfully distribute some amount of crystal methamphetamine on or about (990701-990731), (Field Grade) Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record DOB: 781009 Current ENL Date: 971022 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ????? Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 2 Days The applicant was AWOL for 21 days, however, the DD Form 214 item 29 Time Lost, does not reflect this period of AWOL. The net active service this period should be: 2 Years, 4 Months 2 Days Total Service: 2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 2 Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E2 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 88M10 Motor Transport Operator GT: 104 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: ASR V. Post-Discharge Activity Home of Record: Current Address: Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 1 February 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs (distributed methamphetamines, also possessed and used marijuana, LSD, cocaine, and methamphetamines), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant waived legal counsel, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and to submit a conditional waiver, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 3 March 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Furthermore, the analyst determined that the applicant had many legitimate avenues through which to obtain assistance or relief, without committing the misconduct, which led to the separation action under review. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 31 January 2007 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable DRB voting record: Change No change (Character) Change No change (Reason) (Board member names available upon request) IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, voted to deny relief. Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Ron Williams, Examiner X. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: None RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 2 February 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20060005300 Applicant Name: Mr. ______________________________________________________________________ Page 6 of 6 pages