Applicant Name: ????? Application Receipt Date: 2012/02/29 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: NA I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board. II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Tender Offer: NA See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits III. Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080813 Discharge Received: Date: 080822 Chapter: 5-8 AR: 635-200 Reason: Parenthood RE: SPD: JDG Unit/Location: HSC, Division Spec Trps Bn, 1st Cavalry Division, Fort Hood, TX Time Lost: AWOL for 137 days (070413-070829), apprehended. The evidence of record shows that the applicant was also AWOL x 2 for a total of 23 days (080610-080616) for 7 days, mode of return unknown; (080624-080709) for 16 days, mode of return unknown. However, these periods are not annotated on the DD Form 214 block 29 dates of time lost during this period. Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Soldier’s Overall Record Age at current enlistment: 18 Current ENL Date: 061120 Current ENL Term: 03 Years 20 Weeks Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 04 Mos, 16 Days ????? Total Service: 01 Yrs, 04 Mos, 16 Days ????? Previous Discharges: None Highest Grade: E-3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No MOS: 42A10 Human Resources Spec GT: 89 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR V. Post-Discharge Activity City, State: Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 11 August 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood for failing to provide an adequate family care plan and absenting herself (AWOL) from her unit and Fort Hood on three separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. She was advised of her rights. On 11 August 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 13 August 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant's discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant was not transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (IRR). b. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200, provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Paragraph 5-8 provides that a Soldier may be separated when parental obligations interfere with fulfillment of military responsibilities. Specific reasons for separation because of parenthood include inability to perform prescribed duties satisfactorily, repeated absenteeism, late for work, inability to participate in field training exercises or perform special duties such as CQ and Staff Duty NCO, and non-availability for worldwide assignment or deployment according to the needs of the Army. Unless the reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier being separated for the convenience of the government will be awarded a character of service of honorable, general under honorable conditions or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status. No Soldier will be awarded a characterization of service under honorable conditions under this Chapter unless the Soldier is notified of the specific factors in his/her service record that warrant such a characterization, using the notification procedure. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the documents submitted wih the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicant was discharged for her inability to perform prescribed duties due to parenthood under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200. This involuntary separation was appropriate since the command determined the applicant’s parental obligations interfered with the fulfillment of military responsibilities and she was properly informed as to the specific factors in her service record that would warrant such a characterization of service. The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Although the applicant did not properly annotate the DD Form 293 requesting a review of her record for a possible upgrade of her discharge; she was given the benefit of this review as instructed in pertinent part (E.3.1.3.2) by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28, which stipulates that a request for review from an applicant without an honorable discharge shall be treated as a request for a change to an honorable discharge unless the applicant requests a specific change to another character of discharge. The applicant submitted no issues of equity or propriety to be considered by the Board. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board that relief be denied. VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing Type of Hearing: Date: 3 August 2012 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (120226); DD Form 149, dated (120226); Memorandum for Record, Separation Authority's Documentation, dated (080813); and DD Form 214, dated (080822). VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. IX. Board Decision Board Vote: Character - Change 0 No change 5 Reason - Change 0 No change 5 (Board member names available upon request) X. Board Action Directed Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None XI. Certification Signature Approval Authority: ARCHIE L. DAVIS III Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board BONITA E. TROTMAN Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army Secretary Recorder ????? Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20120004672 ______________________________________________________________________________ Page 3 of 3 pages