1. Applicant's Name: a. Application Date: 8 July 2019 b. Date Received: 9 August 2019 c. Counsel: 2. REQUEST, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION: The applicant requests an upgrade of the characterization of service from under other than honorable conditions to general (under honorable conditions) or honorable. The applicant seeks relief contending, in effect, he believes after two deployments to Iraq, his behavior spiraled out of control due to his combat experiences. He was homeless, divorced and suicidal after his deployments. He needs an upgrade to get health care from the VA. PTSD was the reason for his discharge. He served honorably in the Reserves. Per the Board's Medical Officer, a voting member, based on the information available for review at the time in the service record, the Armed Forces Health Longitudinal Technology Application (AHLTA), and Joint Legacy Viewer (JLV), notes indicate no BH diagnoses. The applicant is not service-connected from the VA. The VA has also diagnosed the applicant with Anxiety Disorder Unspecified. In summary, the applicant does not have a BH diagnosis that is mitigating for the misconduct which led to separation from the Army. In a records review conducted at Arlington, VA on 28 August 2020, and by a 5-0 vote, the Board denied the request upon finding the separation was both proper and equitable. (Board member names available upon request) 3. DISCHARGE DETAILS: a. Reason / Authority / Codes / Characterization: In Lieu of Trial by Court Martial / AR 635-200, Chapter 10 / KFS / RE-4 / Under Other Than Honorable Conditions b. Date of Discharge: 14 October 2009 c. Separation Facts: Yes (1) Date Charges Were Preferred: 15 September 2009 (2) Basis for Separation: The evidence of record contains a DD Form 458, Charge Sheet which indicates on 15 September 2009, the applicant was charged without authority, absented himself from his unit (15 August 2008 to 19 July 2009); and wrongful use of marijuana between (23 June 2008 to 23 July 2008). (3) Recommended Characterization: Applicant's chain of command recommended an Under Other Than Honorable Conditions discharge. (4) Legal Consultation Date: 22 September 2009, applicant requested discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. (5) Administrative Separation Board: NA (6) Separation Decision Date / Characterization: 1 October 2009 / Under Other Than Honorable Conditions 4. SERVICE DETAILS: a. Date / Period of Enlistment: 2 February 2006 / 3 years / previous DD Form 214 indicated in block a DD Form 214 would be issued to provide missing information. b. Age at Enlistment / Education / GT Score: 22 years / HS Graduate / 96 c. Highest Grade Achieved / MOS / Total Service: E-4 / 52D10, Power Generation Equipment Repairer / 5 years, 2 months, 3 days d. Prior Service / Characterizations: USAR, 18 July 2003 to 14 December 2003 / NA AD, 15 December 2003 to 18 March 2005 / HD USAR, 19 March 2005 to 1 February 2006 / NA e. Overseas Service / Combat Service: SWA / Kuwait, 17 February 2004 to 16 February 2005 / Iraq, 4 October 2006 to 4 October 2007 f. Awards and Decorations: NDSM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, ASR, AFRM-"M" DEV, MUC g. Performance Ratings: NA h. Disciplinary Action(s) / Evidentiary Record: A positive urinalysis test coded IR (Inspection Random), dated 23 July 2008, for THC. The applicant received negative counseling statements for being AWOL and a positive drug test. i. Lost Time / Mode of Return: AWOL for 335 days, 15 August 2008 to 19 July 2009; apprehended by civil authorities. j. Diagnosed PTSD / TBI / Behavioral Health: VA Progress Notes, dated 2 July 2015, applicant reported he suffered from PTSD. Disability Benefits Questionnaire, QTC Medical Services, Medical Opinion, dated 27 March 2018, relates the applicant was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. 5. APPLICANT-PROVIDED EVIDENCE: DD Form 293 (two pages); DD Form 149 (two pages); Disability Benefits Questionnaire, QTC Medical Services, Medical Opinion (two pages); and VA documents (85 pages). 6. POST SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS: None submitted with the application. 7. REGULATORY CITATION(S): Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the Service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Army policy states although an honorable or general, under honorable conditions discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. National Defense Authorization Act 2017 provided specific guidance to the Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records and Discharge Review Boards when considering discharge upgrade requests by Veterans claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) in connection with combat or sexual assault or sexual harassment as a basis for discharge review. Further, it provided that Boards will include, as a voting board member, a physician trained in mental health disorders, a clinical psychologist, or a psychiatrist when the discharge upgrade claim asserts a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; as a basis for the discharge. In August 2017, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness provided further clarifying guidance to the Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records when considering requests by Veterans for modification of their discharge due to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Liberal consideration will be given to Veterans petitioning for discharge relief when the application for relief is based in whole or in part on matters relating to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Special consideration will be given to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determinations that document a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment potentially contributed to the circumstances resulting in a less than honorable discharge characterization. Special consideration will also be given in cases where a civilian provider confers diagnoses of a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment if the case records contain narratives supporting symptomatology at the time of service or when any other evidence which may reasonably indicate that a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment existed at the time of discharge might have mitigated the misconduct that caused a discharge of lesser characterization. Conditions documented in the service record that can reasonably be determined to have existed at the time of discharge will be considered to have existed at the time of discharge. In cases in which a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment may be reasonably determined to have existed at the time of discharge, those conditions will be considered potential mitigating factors in the misconduct that caused the characterization of service in question. All Boards will exercise caution in weighing evidence of mitigation in cases in which serious misconduct precipitated a discharge with a less than Honorable characterization of service. Potentially mitigating evidence of the existence of undiagnosed combat related PTSD, PTSD-related conditions due to TBI or sexual assault/harassment as causative factors in the misconduct resulting in discharge will be carefully weighed against the severity of the misconduct. PTSD is not a likely cause of premeditated misconduct. Caution shall be exercised in weighing evidence of mitigation in all cases of misconduct by carefully considering the likely causal relationship of symptoms to the misconduct. 8. DISCUSSION OF FACT(S): The applicant requests an upgrade of the characterization of service from under other than honorable conditions to general (under honorable conditions) or honorable. The applicant's record of service, the issues and documents submitted with his application were carefully reviewed. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge. All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. The under other than honorable conditions discharge received by the applicant was normal and appropriate under the regulatory guidance. His record documents no acts of significant achievement or valor and did not support the issuance of a general or an honorable discharge by the separation authority at the time of separation. The applicant seeks relief contending, he believes after two deployments to Iraq, his behavior spiraled out of control due to his combat experiences. The applicant bears the burden of presenting substantial and credible evidence to support this contention. There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence to support the contention that his behavior was due to combat experiences. The applicant further contends, he needs an upgrade to get health care from the VA; and he was homeless, divorced and suicidal after his deployments. Eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance. The applicant also contends, PTSD was the reason for his discharge. The record of evidence shows that the applicant was discharged by reason of in lieu of trial by court-martial for being AWOL and wrongful use of marijuana. Further, the applicant provided a VA document that indicates he was diagnosed with PTSD and an anxiety disorder, both military related. The applicant additionally contends, he served honorably in the Reserves. The applicant's service accomplishments and the quality of his service prior to the incidents that caused the initiation of discharge proceeding were carefully considered. The discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the regulation, was within the discretion of the separation authority, and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. 9. BOARD DETERMINATION: In a records review conducted at Arlington, VA on 28 August 2020, and by a 5-0 vote, the Board denied the request upon finding the separation was both proper and equitable. 10. BOARD ACTION DIRECTED: a. Issue a New DD-214 / Issue a New Separation Order: No b. Change Characterization to: No Change c. Change Reason to: No Change d. Change Authority to: No Change e. Change SPD / RE Code to: No Change Authenticating Official: Legend: AWOL - Absent Without Leave GD - General Discharge NCO - Noncommissioned Officer SCM - Summary Court Martial BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge HS - High School NIF - Not in File SPCM - Special Court Martial BH - Behavioral Health HD - Honorable Discharge NOS - Not Otherwise Specified SPD - Separation Program Designator CG - Company Grade Article 15 IADT - Initial Active Duty Training OAD - Ordered to Active Duty TBI - Traumatic Brain Injury CID - Criminal Investigation Division MP - Military Police OMPF - Official Military Personnel File UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge ELS - Entry Level Status MST - Military Sexual Trauma PTSD - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions FG - Field Grade Article 15 NA - Not applicable RE - Reentry VA - Veterans Affairs ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE AR20190010972 3