1. Applicant’s Name: a. Application Date: 19 January 2020 b. Date Received: 7 February 2020 c. Counsel: None 2. REQUEST, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION: a. Applicant’s Requests and Issues: The current characterization of service for the period under review is uncharacterized. The applicant requests a narrative reason change. The applicant further requests the verbiage on two memorandums pertaining to the applicant’s separation be changed. The applicant seeks relief contending, in effect, the narrative reason is improper, inequitable, inaccurate, and does not conform to Army regulations. The applicant contends the narrative reason should read “Entry Level Separation” without the remarks of “Entry Level performance and Conduct.” The applicant contends the applicant completed basic training and all objective while attending Officer Candidate School (OCS) and the applicant resigned from OCS under favorable conditions. The applicant desires to rejoin military service. b. Board Type and Decision: In a records review conducted on 21 April 2023, and by a 5-0 vote, the Board denied the request upon finding the separation was both proper and equitable. Please see Section 9 of this document for more detail regarding the Board’s decision. (Board member names available upon request) 3. DISCHARGE DETAILS: a. Reason / Authority / Codes / Characterization: Entry Level Performance and Conduct / NGR 600-200, Paragraph 6-35e / NA / RE-3 / Uncharacterized b. Date of Discharge: 13 July 2015 c. Separation Facts: (1) Date of Notification of Intent to Separate: 2 July 2015 (2) Basis for Separation: The applicant was informed of the following reasons: For Entry Level Performance and Conduct. (3) Recommended Characterization: Uncharacterized (4) Legal Consultation Date: 6 November 2014 (5) Administrative Separation Board: On 6 November 2014, the applicant conditionally voluntarily waived consideration of the case before an administrative separation board, contingent upon receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than an honorable conditions discharge. (6) Separation Decision Date / Characterization: NIF / NIF 4. SERVICE DETAILS: a. Date / Period of Enlistment: 29 October 2013 / 8 years b. Age at Enlistment / Education / GT Score: 29 / Bachelor’s Degree / NIF c. Highest Grade Achieved / MOS / Total Service: E-6 / None / 1 year, 8 months, 15 days d. Prior Service / Characterizations: None e. Overseas Service / Combat Service: None f. Awards and Decorations: None g. Performance Ratings: None h. Disciplinary Action(s) / Evidentiary Record: Memorandum, subject: Release of Officer Candidate, dated 5 October 2014, reflects the applicant was released from the RTI-FL OCS program due to Lack of Motivation, Lack of Adaptability, Leadership Deficiencies, and Failure to Progress (involuntary resignation) and was released without prejudice and could apply in the future. Orders 282-023, dated 9 October 2014, reflect the applicant was reduced in grade from Staff Sergeant (E-6) to Specialist (E-4) with an effective date of 6 October 2014. The reason: Administrative. Orders 288-028, dated 15 October 2014, reflects that applicant was released from 4th BN 211th REG Regional Training Institute, OCS Program-Involuntary Dismissal without prejudice, effective 6 October 2014. Orders 194-041, dated 13 July 2015, reflects the applicant was discharged from the ARNG, and as a reserve of the Army effective 13 July 2015, due to Entry Level Performance and Conduct with an Uncharacterized discharge. i. Lost Time / Mode of Return: None j. Behavioral Health Condition(s): (1) Applicant provided: None (2) AMHRR Listed: None 5. APPLICANT-PROVIDED EVIDENCE: DD Form 149; self-authored statement; Reserve Component Officer Candidate School End of Course Summary; email correspondence regarding OCS release request; OCS Enrollment Request for Release; email correspondence regarding enlistment options; NGB Form 22; Memorandum from Applicant; medical document; copies of military personnel records; email correspondence from the Office of the Inspector General for the Florida National Guard; Letter from the Office of the Inspector General. 6. POST SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS: None submitted with the application. 7. STATUTORY, REGULATORY AND POLICY REFERENCE(S): a. Section 1553, Title 10, United States Code (Review of Discharge or Dismissal) provides for the creation, composition, and scope of review conducted by a Discharge Review Board(s) within established governing standards. As amended by Sections 521 and 525 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, 10 USC 1553 provides specific guidance to the Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records and Discharge Review Boards when considering discharge upgrade requests by Veterans claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), sexual trauma, intimate partner violence (IPV), or spousal abuse, as a basis for discharge review. The amended guidance provides that Boards will include, as a voting board member, a physician trained in mental health disorders, a clinical psychologist, or a psychiatrist when the discharge upgrade claim asserts a mental health condition, including PTSD, TBI, sexual trauma, IPV, or spousal abuse, as a basis for the discharge. Further, the guidance provides that Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records and Discharge Review Boards will develop and provide specialized training specific to sexual trauma, IPV, spousal abuse, as well as the various responses of individuals to trauma. b. Multiple Department of Defense Policy Guidance Memoranda published between 2014 and 2018. The documents are commonly referred to by the signatory authorities’ last names (2014 Secretary of Defense Guidance [Hagel memo], 2016 Acting Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Carson memo], 2017 Official Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Kurta memo], and 2018 Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Wilkie memo]. (1) Individually and collectively, these documents provide further clarification to the Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records when considering requests by Veterans for modification of their discharge due to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Liberal consideration will be given to Veterans petitioning for discharge relief when the application for relief is based in whole or in part on matters relating to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Special consideration will be given to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determinations that document a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment potentially contributed to the circumstances resulting in a less than honorable discharge characterization. Special consideration will also be given in cases where a civilian provider confers diagnoses of a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment if the case records contain narratives supporting symptomatology at the time of service or when any other evidence which may reasonably indicate that a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment existed at the time of discharge might have mitigated the misconduct that caused a discharge of lesser characterization. (2) Conditions documented in the service record that can reasonably be determined to have existed at the time of discharge will be considered to have existed at the time of discharge. In cases in which a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment may be reasonably determined to have existed at the time of discharge, those conditions will be considered potential mitigating factors in the misconduct that caused the characterization of service in question. All Boards will exercise caution in weighing evidence of mitigation in cases in which serious misconduct precipitated a discharge with a less than Honorable characterization of service. Potentially mitigating evidence of the existence of undiagnosed combat related PTSD, PTSD-related conditions due to TBI or sexual assault/harassment as causative factors in the misconduct resulting in discharge will be carefully weighed against the severity of the misconduct. PTSD is not a likely cause of premeditated misconduct. Caution shall be exercised in weighing evidence of mitigation in all cases of misconduct by carefully considering the likely causal relationship of symptoms to the misconduct. c. Army Regulation 15-180 (Army Discharge Review Board) sets forth the policies and procedures under which the Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to review the character, reason, and authority of any Servicemember discharged from active military service within 15 years of the Servicemember’s date of discharge. Additionally, it prescribes actions and composition of the Army Discharge Review Board under Public Law 95-126; Section 1553, Title 10 United States Code; and Department of Defense Directive 1332.41 and Instruction 1332.28. d. National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200, establishes standards, policies, and procedures for the management of the Army National Guard (ARNG) and the Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS) enlisted Soldiers in the functional areas of: Classification and Reclassification; Personnel Management; Assignment and Transfer, including interstate transfer; Special Duty Assignment Pay; Enlisted Separations; and Command Sergeant Major Program. Chapter 6 sets the policies, standards, and procedures for the separation of enlisted Soldiers from the ARNG/ARNGUS, paragraph 6-35e refers to AR 135-178, chapter 8 for entry level performance and conduct separations. e. Army Regulation 135-178 sets forth the policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of Army National Guard and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons. The separation policies throughout the different Chapters in this regulation promote the readiness of the Army by providing an orderly means to judge the suitability of persons to serve on the basis of their conduct and their ability to meet required standards of duty performance and discipline. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, and convictions by civil authorities. (1) Paragraph 2-7 prescribes possible characterizations of service include an honorable, general (under honorable conditions), under other than honorable conditions, or uncharacterized if the Soldier is in entry-level status. However, the permissible range of characterization varies based on the reason for separation. (2) Paragraph 2-8, prescribes the characterization is based upon the quality of the Soldier’s service, including the reason for separation, and determined in accordance with standards of acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty as found in the UCMJ, Army regulations, and the time-honored customs and traditions of the Army. The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. (3) Paragraph 8-1a, prescribes that a Soldier may be separated under this chapter if he or she is notified of the initiation of separation proceedings while in an entry level status (see glossary) when it is determined under the guidance set forth in chapter 2, section I, of this regulation, that the Soldier is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance or conduct (or both), as evidenced by inability, lack of reasonable effort, failure to adapt to the military environment or minor disciplinary infractions. (4) Paragraph 8-1b, prescribes when a separation of a Soldier in entry level status is warranted by unsatisfactory performance or minor disciplinary infractions (or both), the Soldier normally will be separated in accordance with this chapter. Nothing in this chapter prevents separation under another provision of this regulation when such is warranted. (5) Paragraph 8-2 prescribes separation processing may not be initiated under this chapter until the Soldier has been formally counseled under the requirements prescribed by paragraph 2-4. (6) Paragraph 8-3 prescribes the service of a Soldier who is separated under this chapter will be uncharacterized. 8. SUMMARY OF FACT(S): The Army Discharge Review Board considers applications for upgrade as instructed by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28. The applicant requests an upgrade to honorable. The applicant’s Army Military Human Resources Record (AMHRR), the issues, and documents submitted with the application were carefully reviewed. The applicant contends the narrative reason for the discharge should be changed. The applicant was separated under the provisions of Chapter 6-35e, NGR 600-200, due to “Entry Level Performance and Conduct” with an Uncharacterized discharge. NGR 600-200, paragraph 6-35e refers to AR 135-178, Chapter 8 for entry level performance and conduct separations. Paragraph 8-1b, prescribes when a separation of a Soldier in entry level status is warranted by unsatisfactory performance or minor disciplinary infractions (or both), the Soldier normally will be separated in accordance with this chapter. Nothing in this chapter prevents separation under another provision of this regulation when such is warranted. The applicant contends the narrative reason is improper, inequitable, inaccurate, and does not conform to Army regulations. NGR 600-200, paragraph 6-35e refers to AR 135-178, chapter 8 for entry level performance and conduct separations. Paragraph 8-1b, prescribes when a separation of a Soldier in entry level status is warranted by unsatisfactory performance or minor disciplinary infractions (or both), the Soldier normally will be separated in accordance with this chapter. Nothing in this chapter prevents separation under another provision of this regulation when such is warranted. The applicant contends the applicant completed basic training and all objectives while attending Officer Candidate School (OCS) and the applicant resigned from OCS under favorable conditions. The Board will consider the applicant’s service accomplishments and the quality of service according to the DODI 1332.28. The applicant desires to rejoin the Military Service. Soldiers processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. Based on Army Regulation 601-201, the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of “3.” There is no basis upon which to grant a change to the reason or the RE code. An RE Code of “3” indicates the applicant requires a waiver before being allowed to reenlist. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the Army’s needs at the time and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate. The applicant contends an upgrade of the discharge will allow the applicant to obtain better employment. The Board does not grant relief to gain employment or enhance employment opportunities. The applicant requests the verbiage on two memorandums pertaining to the applicant’s separation be changed. The applicant’s requests do not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board. The applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), using the enclosed DD Form 149 regarding this matter. A DD Form 149 may also be obtained from a Veterans’ Service Organization. 9. BOARD DISCUSSION AND DETERMINATION: a. As directed by the 2017 memo signed by A.M. Kurta, the board considered the following factors: (1) Did the applicant have a condition or experience that may excuse or mitigate the discharge? No. The Board’s Medical Advisor reviewed DoD and VA medical records and found no mitigating BH diagnoses on the applicant. The applicant provided no documents or testimony of a condition or experience, that, when applying liberal consideration, could have excused or mitigated a discharge. (2) Did the condition exist, or experience occur during military service? N/A (3) Does the condition or experience actually excuse or mitigate the discharge? N/A (4) Does the condition or experience outweigh the discharge? N/A b. Response to Contention(s): (1) The applicant contends that applicant successfully completed basic training impeccably, as fully documented in the applicant’s military record, which is the prerequisite and principal determination of assessing qualifications for attending advanced individual training and continuing service in the Army National Guard. The Board considered the totality of the applicant’s service record but determined since the applicant was discharged for failing to meet the standards at Officer Candidate School Program completion due to Lack of Motivation, Lack of Adaptability, Leadership Deficiencies, and Failure to Progress. The applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of the applicant’s service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. (2) The applicant contends all of the items requested to be removed are improper, inequitable, inaccurate and do not conform to Army regulations. The Board determined that the applicant’s request however, a change to the military record does not fall within the purview of the ADRB. The applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), using a DD Form 149 regarding this matter. A DD Form 149 may be obtained from a Veterans’ Service Organization. (3) The applicant contends he desires to rejoin the Military Service. The Board considered this contention and voted to maintain the RE-code to a RE-3, which is a waivable code. An RE Code of “3” indicates the applicant requires a waiver before being allowed to reenlist. Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the Army’s needs at the time and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes, if appropriate. (4) The applicant contends an upgrade of the discharge will allow the applicant to obtain better employment. The board considered this contention but does not grant relief to gain employment or enhance employment opportunities. c. The Board determined that the discharge is, at this time, proper and equitable, considering the current evidence of record. However, the applicant may request a personal appearance hearing to address the issues before the Board. The applicant is responsible for satisfying the burden of proof and providing documents or other evidence sufficient to support the applicant’s contention(s) that the discharge was improper or inequitable. d. Rationale for Decision: (1) The Board voted not to change the applicant’s characterization of service because there were no mitigating factors for the board to consider since the applicant was discharged for failing to meet the standards at Officer Candidate School Program completion due to Lack of Motivation, Lack of Adaptability, Leadership Deficiencies, and Failure to Progress. Thus, Uncharacterized is proper and equitable and the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the regulation, was within the discretion of the separation authority, and the applicant was provided full administrative due process. (2) The Board voted not to change the applicant’s reason for discharge or accompanying SPD code under the same pretexts, and the reason the applicant was discharged was both proper and equitable. (3) The RE code will not change, as the current code is consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the regulation. 10. BOARD ACTION DIRECTED: a. Issue a New DD-214 / Separation Order: No b. Change Characterization to: No Change c. Change Reason to: No Change d. Change RE Code to: No Change e. Change Authority to: No Change Authenticating Official: Legend: AWOL – Absent Without Leave AMHRR – Army Military Human Resource Record BCD – Bad Conduct Discharge BH – Behavioral Health CG – Company Grade Article 15 CID – Criminal Investigation Division ELS – Entry Level Status FG – Field Grade Article 15 GD – General Discharge HS – High School HD – Honorable Discharge IADT – Initial Active Duty Training MP – Military Police MST – Military Sexual Trauma N/A – Not applicable NCO – Noncommissioned Officer NIF – Not in File NOS – Not Otherwise Specified OAD – Ordered to Active Duty OBH (I) – Other Behavioral Health (Issues) OMPF – Official Military Personnel File PTSD – Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder RE – Re-entry SCM – Summary Court Martial SPCM – Special Court Martial SPD – Separation Program Designator TBI – Traumatic Brain Injury UNC – Uncharacterized Discharge UOTHC – Under Other Than Honorable Conditions VA – Department of Veterans Affairs ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE AR20200009775 1