1. Applicant's Name: a. Application Date: 26 April 2021 b. Date Received: 26 April 2021 c. Counsel: None 2. REQUEST, ISSUES, BOARD TYPE, AND DECISION: a. Applicant's Requests and Issues: The current characterization of service for the period under review is general (under honorable conditions). The applicant requests an upgrade to honorable. The applicant seeks relief contending, in effect, PTSD was the reason for the discharge. The applicant states completing the first term of enlistment honorably. b. Board Type and Decision: In a records review conducted on 20 April 2023, and by a 5-0 vote, the Board determined the discharge is inequitable based on the totality of the record to include the length and quality of the applicant's service, the applicant's PTSD, TBI and the passage of time since the discharge, outweighing the basis for separation. Therefore, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to Honorable and changed to the separation authority to AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a, the narrative reason for separation to Misconduct (Minor Infractions), with a corresponding separation code of JKN. The Board determined that the RE code was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Please see Section 9 of this document for more detail regarding the Board's decision. (Board member names available upon request) 3. DISCHARGE DETAILS: a. Reason / Authority / Codes / Characterization: Misconduct (Serious Offense) / AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c / JKQ / RE-3 / General (Under Honorable Conditions) b. Date of Discharge: 13 November 2014 c. Separation Facts: (1) Date of Notification of Intent to Separate: illegible (2) Basis for Separation: The applicant was informed of the following reasons: The applicant operated a vehicle while drunk and assaulted another person on 8 December 2013. (3) Recommended Characterization: General (Under Honorable Conditions) (4) Legal Consultation Date: 19 May 2014 (5) Administrative Separation Board: NA (6) Separation Decision Date / Characterization: 7 August 2014 / General (Under Honorable Conditions) / The separation authority found the disability was not the cause, or substantial contributing cause, of the misconduct committed and no other circumstances warranted disability processing instead of alternate administrative separation. The separation authority directs this case not be processed through medical disability channels. 4. SERVICE DETAILS: a. Date / Period of Enlistment: 22 May 2012 / 3 years b. Age at Enlistment / Education / GT Score: 21 / High School Graduate / 89 c. Highest Grade Achieved / MOS / Total Service: E-4 / 11B1P, Infantryman / 4 years, 6 months, 2 days d. Prior Service / Characterizations: RA, 12 May 2010 - 21 May 2012 / HD e. Overseas Service / Combat Service: Alaska, SWA / Afghanistan (15 December 2011 - 4 October 2012) f. Awards and Decorations: ACM-CS, ARCOM, AGCM, NDSM, GWOTSM, ASR, OSR-2, NATOMDL, CIB g. Performance Ratings: NA h. Disciplinary Action(s) / Evidentiary Record: Military Police Report, dated 12 December 2013, reflects the applicant was apprehended for: Drunken driving; Simple assault consummated by a battery (on post). FG Article 15, dated 7 January 2014, on or about 8 December 2013, physically control a passenger car while drunk and assault spouse by pushing with the hands. The punishment consisted of a reduction to E-1; forfeiture of $758 pay per month for two months (suspended); and extra duty and restriction for 45 days. General Officer Memorandum Of Reprimand, dated 14 January 2014, reflects the applicant was reprimanded for driving under the influence of alcohol on Joint Base Richardson, Alaska, on 8 December 2013. A Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Security Force Officer was dispatched to the applicant's location after receiving a report the applicant left the scene of a domestic violence disturbance between the applicant and spouse in vehicle while under the influence of alcohol. The Officer initiated contact with the applicant after the vehicle had become stuck in a ditch. Subsequently, the applicant failed a series of Standardized Field Sobriety Tests and provided a breath sample resulting in a Breath Alcohol Content (Br AC) of .176 percent. i. Lost Time / Mode of Return: None j. Diagnosed PTSD / TBI / Behavioral Health: Report of Mental Status Evaluation, dated 17 December 2013, reflects the applicant was cleared for any administrative actions deemed appropriate by the command. The applicant could understand and participate in administrative proceedings; could appreciate the difference between right and wrong; and met medical retention requirements. The applicant had been screened for PTSD and mTBI with positive results. The conditions were either not present or did not meet AR 40-501 criteria for a medical evaluation board. The command was advised to consider the influence of these conditions. The applicant was screened positive on both the OTSG required PTSD and TBI screening tools. The applicant denies current homicidal or suicidal ideations. SM is not cleared to proceed with the chapter 14 process until further follow up and diagnosis has been rendered. The applicant is being command referred to ASAP. Report of Mental Status Evaluation, dated 7 May 2014, reflects the applicant was cleared for any administrative actions deemed appropriate by the command. The applicant could understand and participate in administrative proceedings; could appreciate the difference between right and wrong; and met medical retention requirements. The applicant had been screened for PTSD and mTBI with negative results. The conditions were either not present or did not meet AR 40-501 criteria for a medical evaluation board. The command was advised to consider the influence of these conditions. The applicant was administered the OSTG required PTSD and TBI screening tools on 17 December 2013 in which the applicant screened positive. Further evaluation of PTSD symptoms was completed on 27 December 2013 with finding not supported PTSD Diagnosis. Furthermore, the applicant was seen for TBI screen with diagnosis of Post traumatic headache. The conditions do not meet AR 40-501 criteria for Medical Evaluation Board. The applicant provided a copy of a VA Rating Decision dated 24 June 2016, which reflects an evaluation of 50 percent for PTSD and 10 percent for TBI. 5. APPLICANT-PROVIDED EVIDENCE: DD Form 214; Two DD Forms 293; Separation packet. VA Rating Decision. 6. POST SERVICE ACCOMPLISHMENTS: None submitted with the application. 7. STATUTORY, REGULATORY AND POLICY REFERENCE(S): a. Section 1553, Title 10, United States Code (Review of Discharge or Dismissal) provides for the creation, composition, and scope of review conducted by a Discharge Review Board(s) within established governing standards. As amended by Sections 521 and 525 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2020, 10 USC 1553 provides specific guidance to the Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records and Discharge Review Boards when considering discharge upgrade requests by Veterans claiming Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), sexual trauma, intimate partner violence (IPV), or spousal abuse, as a basis for discharge review. The amended guidance provides that Boards will include, as a voting board member, a physician trained in mental health disorders, a clinical psychologist, or a psychiatrist when the discharge upgrade claim asserts a mental health condition, including PTSD, TBI, sexual trauma, IPV, or spousal abuse, as a basis for the discharge. Further, the guidance provides that Military Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records and Discharge Review Boards will develop and provide specialized training specific to sexual trauma, IPV, spousal abuse, as well as the various responses of individuals to trauma. b. Multiple Department of Defense Policy Guidance Memoranda published between 2014 and 2018. The documents are commonly referred to by the signatory authorities' last names (2014 Secretary of Defense Guidance [Hagel memo], 2016 Acting Principal Deputy Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Carson memo], 2017 Official Performing the Duties of the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Kurta memo], and 2018 Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness [Wilkie memo]. (1) Individually and collectively, these documents provide further clarification to the Military Discharge Review Boards and Boards for Correction of Military/Naval Records when considering requests by Veterans for modification of their discharge due to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Liberal consideration will be given to Veterans petitioning for discharge relief when the application for relief is based in whole or in part on matters relating to mental health conditions, including PTSD; TBI; sexual assault; or sexual harassment. Special consideration will be given to Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determinations that document a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment potentially contributed to the circumstances resulting in a less than honorable discharge characterization. Special consideration will also be given in cases where a civilian provider confers diagnoses of a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment if the case records contain narratives supporting symptomatology at the time of service or when any other evidence which may reasonably indicate that a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment existed at the time of discharge might have mitigated the misconduct that caused a discharge of lesser characterization. (2) Conditions documented in the service record that can reasonably be determined to have existed at the time of discharge will be considered to have existed at the time of discharge. In cases in which a mental health condition, including PTSD; TBI; or sexual assault/harassment may be reasonably determined to have existed at the time of discharge, those conditions will be considered potential mitigating factors in the misconduct that caused the characterization of service in question. All Boards will exercise caution in weighing evidence of mitigation in cases in which serious misconduct precipitated a discharge with a less than Honorable characterization of service. Potentially mitigating evidence of the existence of undiagnosed combat related PTSD, PTSD-related conditions due to TBI or sexual assault/harassment as causative factors in the misconduct resulting in discharge will be carefully weighed against the severity of the misconduct. PTSD is not a likely cause of premeditated misconduct. Caution shall be exercised in weighing evidence of mitigation in all cases of misconduct by carefully considering the likely causal relationship of symptoms to the misconduct. c. Army Regulation 15-180 (Army Discharge Review Board), sets forth the policies and procedures under which the Army Discharge Review Board is authorized to review the character, reason, and authority of any Servicemember discharged from active military service within 15 years of the Servicemember's date of discharge. Additionally, it prescribes actions and composition of the Army Discharge Review Board under Public Law 95-126; Section 1553, Title 10 United States Code; and Department of Defense Directive 1332.41 and Instruction 1332.28. d. Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. (1) Chapter 3, Section II provides the authorized types of characterization of service or description of separation. (2) Paragraph 3-7a states an Honorable discharge is a separation with honor and is appropriate when the quality of the Soldier's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. (3) Paragraph 3-7b states a General discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions and is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. (4) Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or being absent without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. (5) Paragraph 14-3 prescribes a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record. (6) Paragraph 14-12c prescribes a Soldier is subject to action per this section for commission of a serious military or civilian offense, if the specific circumstances of the offense warrant separation and a punitive discharge is, or would be, authorized for the same or a closely related offense under the Manual for Courts-Martial. e. Army Regulation 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes, provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. It identifies the SPD code of "JKQ" as the appropriate code to assign enlisted Soldiers who are discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, misconduct (serious offense). f. Army Regulation 601-210, Regular Army and Reserve Components Enlistment Program, governs eligibility criteria, policies, and procedures for enlistment and processing of persons into the Regular Army, the U.S. Army Reserve, and Army National Guard for enlistment per DODI 1304.26. It also prescribes the appointment, reassignment, management, and mobilization of Reserve Officers' Training Corps cadets under the Simultaneous Membership Program. Chapter 4 provides the criteria and procedures for waiverable and nonwaiverable separations. Table 3-1, defines reentry eligibility (RE) codes: RE-3 Applies to: Person who is not considered fully qualified for reentry or continuous service at time of separation, but disqualification is waiverable. Eligibility: Ineligible unless a waiver is granted. 8. SUMMARY OF FACT(S): The Army Discharge Review Board considers applications for upgrade as instructed by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28. The applicant requests an upgrade to honorable. The applicant's record of service, the issues and documents submitted with the application were carefully reviewed. The applicant contend PTSD was the reason for discharge. The applicant provided a copy of a VA Rating Decision dated 24 June 2016, which reflects an evaluation of 50 percent for PTSD and 10 percent for TBI. The AMHRR includes a Report of Mental Status Evaluation (MSE), dated 7 May 2014, which reflects the applicant was cleared for any administrative actions deemed appropriate by the command. The applicant could understand and participate in administrative proceedings; could appreciate the difference between right and wrong; and met medical retention requirements. The applicant had been screened for PTSD and mTBI with negative results. The conditions were either not present or did not meet AR 40-501 criteria for a medical evaluation board. The command was advised to consider the influence of these conditions. The applicant was administered the OSTG required PTSD and TBI screening tools on 17 December 2013 in which the applicant screened positive. Further evaluation of PTSD symptoms was completed on 27 December 2013 with finding not supported PTSD Diagnosis. Furthermore, the applicant was seen for TBI screen with diagnosis of Post traumatic headache. The conditions do not meet AR 40-501 criteria for Medical Evaluation Board. The MSEs were considered by the separation authority. The applicant contends good service, including a combat tour. The third-party statements provided with the application speak highly of the applicant and recognize the applicant's good conduct in the Army. 9. BOARD DISCUSSION AND DETERMINATION: a. As directed by the 2017 memo signed by A.M. Kurta, the board considered the following factors: (1) Did the applicant have a condition or experience that may excuse or mitigate the discharge? Yes. The Board's Medical Advisor, a voting member, reviewed the applicant's DOD and VA health records, applicant's statement, and/or civilian provider documentation and found that the applicant has the following potentially mitigating diagnoses/experiences: PTSD, TBI, Anxiety, Adjustment Disorder. (2) Did the condition exist, or experience occur during military service? Yes. The Board's Medical Advisor found that the applicant was diagnosed in service with PTSD, TBI, an Adjustment Disorder, and Anxiety. The VA has also service-connected applicant's PTSD and TBI. (3) Does the condition or experience actually excuse or mitigate the discharge? Partial. The Board's Medical Advisor applied liberal consideration and opined that the applicant PTSD/ TBI mitigates the applicant's DUI given the nexus between PTSD/TBI and self-medicating with substances. However, applicant's PTSD, TBI, Anxiety, and Adjustment Disorder do not mitigate the applicant's assault as there is no natural sequela between these behavioral health conditions and assault. Rather, domestic assault involves a purposeful act of aggression toward a specific victim uncharacteristic of any of the applicant's behavioral health conditions. (4) Does the condition or experience outweigh the discharge? No. After applying liberal consideration to the evidence, including the Board Medical Advisor opine, the Board determined that, while the applicant's PTSD/TBI conditions mitigate the applicant's DUI, the available evidence did not support a conclusion that the applicant's behavioral health conditions outweighed the medically unmitigated basis for applicant's separation - assault. b. Response to Contention(s): (1) The applicant contend PTSD was the reason for discharge. The Board considered this contention and determined that an upgrade was warranted based on the totality of the record to include the length and quality of the applicant's service, the applicant's PTSD, TBI, Anxiety, Adjustment Disorder , and the passage of time since the discharge, outweighing the basis for separation. (2) The applicant contends good service, including a combat tour. The Board considered this contention and determined it was valid and ultimately voted to upgrade based on the totality of the record to include the length and quality of the applicant's service, the applicant's PTSD, TBI, Anxiety, Adjustment Disorder, and the passage of time since the discharge, outweighing the basis for separation. c. The Board determined the discharge is inequitable based on the totality of the record to include the length and quality of the applicant's service, the applicant's PTSD, TBI and the passage of time since the discharge, outweighing the basis for separation. Therefore, the Board voted to grant relief. d. Rationale for Decision: (1) The Board voted to change the applicant's characterization of service to Honorable based on the totality of the record to include the length and quality of the applicant's service, the applicant's PTSD, TBI and the passage of time since the discharge, outweighing the basis for separation. Thus, the prior characterization is no longer appropriate. (2) The Board voted to change the reason for discharge to Misconduct (Minor Infractions) under the same pretexts, thus the reason for discharge is no longer appropriate. The SPD code associated with the new reason for discharge is JKN. (3) The RE code will not change, as the current code is consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the regulation. 10. BOARD ACTION DIRECTED: a. Issue a New DD-214: Yes b. Change Characterization to: Honorable c. Change Reason / SPD Code to: Misconduct (Minor Infractions)/JKN d. Change RE Code to: No Change e. Change Authority to: AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12a Authenticating Official: Legend: AWOL - Absent Without Leave AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge BH - Behavioral Health CG - Company Grade Article 15 CID - Criminal Investigation Division ELS - Entry Level Status FG - Field Grade Article 15 GD - General Discharge HS - High School HD - Honorable Discharge IADT - Initial Active Duty Training MP - Military Police MST - Military Sexual Trauma N/A - Not applicable NCO - Noncommissioned Officer NIF - Not in File NOS - Not Otherwise Specified OAD - Ordered to Active Duty OBH (I) - Other Behavioral Health (Issues) OMPF - Official Military Personnel File PTSD - Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder RE - Re-entry SCM - Summary Court Martial SPCM - Special Court Martial SPD - Separation Program Designator TBI - Traumatic Brain Injury UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge UOTHC - Under Other Than Honorable Conditions VA - Department of Veterans Affairs ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE AR20210002215 1