UNITED STATES COAST GUARD DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD Docket #: 2021-016 Discharge Issued Character: Uncharacterized Narrative Reason: Entry Level Performance Conduct SPD/RE Code: JGA / RE4 Authority of Discharge: COMDTINST M1000.4 ART 1.B.19 Date of Separation: 2/5/2020 DRB Decision Character: No Change Narrative Reason: No Change SPD/RE Code: No Change / RE3L New Authority: No Change Discharge Review Board Discussion and Decision: DISCUSSION: The applicant was discharged for Entry Level Performance And Conduct. After 127 days of training, the applicant was unable to meet the minimum training requirements set forth. The applicant acknowledged via signature the required notification of intent to separate and the discharge documents presented during the process of separation for unsuitability for military service, inaptitude. Separation documentation reflects that the recruit was counseled regarding reenlistment at the time of discharge. An uncharacterized character of service is not derogatory in nature. COMDTINST M1000.4 CH 3 Art. 1.B.19, in accordance with 10 U.S.C. § 1169, prescribes this character for individuals who were separated while in an entry-level status (fewer than 180 days of active service) when there was no associated conduct to warrant a less desirable character of service. On the propriety standard, the Board referred to the Separation Program Designator Handbook with regard to the Reenlistment Code for this separation. This discharge was inconsistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of policy within the discretion of the separation authority. The former member was properly discharged for misconduct, however, the RE code issued is not in alignment with policy. The discharge authority assigned an SPD of JGA which only authorizes RE-3L. Therefore, the Board recommends the RE-4 be amended to RE-3L. An RE-3L reentry code represents entry-level separation – must have waiver to reenlist. Depending on the circumstances of the discharge and disqualification, a request for a waiver may be submitted as part of the request for reenlistment through a recruiter of the gaining service. RECOMMENDATION: The Board members thoroughly reviewed the applicant’s record of service and all available documentation. The Board deemed that the applicant’s character of service and reason for separation are appropriate and should not be changed. 2 In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence (to include evidence submitted by the Applicant) to rebut the presumption.