DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

LCC
Docket No. 6—08
5 Feb 08

From:	Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:	Secretary of the Navy

Subj:	REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:	(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:	(1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2)	NAVSUPSYSCMD memo 4050 Ser 53C/005 of 18 Jan 08
(3)	Subject’s naval record

1.	Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected

to show the orders that reassigned Petitioner were issued prior to
18 October 2007.

2.	The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 February 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.	The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.	Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.	In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.

Docket No. 6-08
RECONNENDAT IONS

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.	The orders that reassigned the Petitioner from Lemoore, CA to VFA 11, Virginia Beach Oceana were issued on “12 October 2007” vice any other date. The auditors will calculate the Petitioner’s reimbursement per JFTR U5320-D2 for all allowable charges, based on total weight moved, not to exceed the Government’s cost for shipping a like weight of HHG between authorized points.

(NOTE: A copy of all receipts, copy of the truck rental contract, and
a copy of this letter will be mailed to the Business Support
Department HHG Audit Team Division, Code 302, 1968 Gilbert Street, STE
600, Norfolk, VA 23511—3392.)

b.	A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN	WILLIAM J. HESS, III
Recorder	Acting Recorder

5.	Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

5 February 2008
W.DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director