DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7_01 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 
Docket No. ·8079-15 

Dear 


This i~ in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552. Your case was reconsidered in accordance with Board for Correction of Naval Records procedures that conform to Lips~n v. Secretary of t he Army, 335 F. Supp. 2d 48 (D. D.C. 2004) . You previously petitioned t he Board and were denied relief on 16 September 2010. 
Your current application was reviewed for new evidence not previously considered by t he Board. You submitted an application containing excerpts from your records that wer e previously considered by this Board. In addition, you provided a legal memorandum from a law firm that provided you an assessment of your case; this is not considered new evidence since it merely rest ates the facts of your case and assesses the decisions of the Board. Since no new evidence not previously considered by the Board was found in your application, your request for reconsideration is denied and your case i s hereby administratively closed. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one year from t he date of the Board's decision.. New evldence ·is evi dence not previously considered by the Board prior to making _its deci sion in this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all of ficial records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval recor d, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.