DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 

Docket No. 11202-16 
DEC 26 2017 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records 
To: Secretary ofthe Navy 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO 

Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. § 1552 
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 
(2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0134 of23 Mar 17 
(3) Subject's naval record 

1. Pursuant to the provisions ofreference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed 
enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected 
to be advanced from the August 2016 Cycle 099 Navy Wide Advancement Examination 
(NWAE). 

2. The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner's and 
allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2017 and, pursuant to its regulations, 
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence 
ofrecord. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofthe enclosures, naval 
records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of 
error and injustice, finds as follows: 

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available 
under existing law and regulations within the Department ofthe Navy. 

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject 
matter addressed in Petitioner's application has commented to the effect that the request has 
partial merit and warrants partial favorable action. 

CONCLUSION 

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence ofrecord, and especially in light of the 
contents ofenclosure (2), the Board agreed that once you transitioned from the reserves to active 
duty (Full Time Support), your Final Multiple Score (FMS) had to equal to or greater than the 
FMS required for the new competitive category in the same rating. The Board agreed that you 
did not meet the minimum FMS; however, the Board agreed that you should have earned passed 
not advanced (PNA) points. The Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the 
following partial corrective action. 

RECOMMENDATION 

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: 

The Petitioner was awarded 1.5 PNA points from the August 2016 Cycle 099 NWAE. Note: the 
PNA points were earned from the Petitioner's Performance Mark Average (PMA) of4.00. The 
profile sheet will remain invalidated. 

In so far as Petitioner's request for corrective action that exceeds the foregoing, the Board 
concurred with the advisory opinion. The Board agreed that you did not meet the minimum 

FMS from Cycle 232 NWAE to be advanced. The August 2016 Cycle 099 NWAE 
FMS was 105.27 which did not equal or exceed the FMS required of 120.02 from the September 
2016 Cycle 232 NWAE. 

A copy ofthis Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner's naval record. 

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the 
foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter. 

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe 
Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code ofFederal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and 
having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing 
corrective action, taken under the authority ofreference (a), has been approved by the Board on 
behalfofthe Secretary ofthe Navy. 

Executive Director