DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records To: Secretary ofthe Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record (excerpts) 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his RE-4 reentry code (ineligible for reenlistment) be upgraded. 2. The Board, consisting of , reviewed Petitioner's allegations oferror and injustice on 18 July 2016, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the partial corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofthe enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, the Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department ofthe Navy. b. Enclosure (I) was filed in a timely manner. c. The Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps and began a period ofactive duty on 12 June 2001. During the period of 12 July 2004 through 18 May 2005, the Petitioner received multiple adverse paperwork for unsatisfactory performance while on the Body Composition Program (BCP). Because ofthis, the Commanding Officer issued a page 11 informing the Petitioner he was not recommended for reenlistment due to failure to meet height and weight standards and be assigned an RE-4 code. d. On 11 June 2005, the Petitioner received released from active duty, transferred to the Marine Corps Reserves with an honorable character of service, and was issued an RE-4 reentry code. e. On 22 June 2008, the Petitioner was discharged from the military. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration ofall the evidence ofrecord, the Board concluded that the Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. In this regard, his reentry code shall be changed to "RE-3P" (failure to meet physical/medical standards). In this regard, the Board determined that, in accordance with Navy regulations, the "RE-3P" reentry code is appropriate for the reason for separation as stated on Petitioner's Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty (DD Form 214). Further, there was no evidence in Petitioner's record that sufficiently justified the RE-4 reentry code. RECOMMENDATION: a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that, on 11 June 2005, he was issued an "RE-3P" reentry code. b. That, upon request, the Department ofVeterans Affairs be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board. c. That a copy ofthis report ofproceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record. 4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code ofFederal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation ofauthority set out in Section 6(e) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code ofFederal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority ofreference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalfofthe Secretary of the Navy. Executive Director Acting