DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 5983-16 JUN 16 2017 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions oftitle 10 ofthe United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2017. The names and votes ofthe members ofthe panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 January 2014, and began the course. On 5 August 2014, you were dropped from the course for having vision that was not correctable to 20120. You were counseled on reclassifying to a different Military Occupational Specialty (MOS), and were given the opportunity to change from to . You were informed that failure to reclassify could result in administrative separation processing. You elected not to reclassify and were discharged from the Marine Corps on 9 October 2014, with an honorable characterization ofservice due to unsatisfactory performance and received a reenlistment code (RE) ofRE-4. The Board considered your request for a change to your RE-4 code on the basis that no disciplinary action was placed upon you during your time ofservice and you did not fail any training that was given to you. When making its determination, the Board noted reviewed your service record, to include your enlistment contract and the counseling statement noting that you were notified ofthe opportunity to reclassify in the Marine Corps and continue your service. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as you honorable service from January 2014 through October 2014, as well as your release from the course through no fault ofyour own. The Board noted that your record contains a statement from you, dated 4 September 2012, in which you stated that you did not desire to remain in the Marine Corps, and that you "believe when (you) signed a contract with the Marine Corps (you were) not in the right state ofmind." You also stated that you do not believe you would be a model Marine should you remain in the military. The Board found that you were properly notified ofthe consequences ofyour failure to reclassify and that you expressed the desire to separate from military rather than seek an alternate MOS. The Board concluded that your record, including your personal statement of 4 September 2012, support the RE-4 code. Accordingly, your, application has been denied. It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption ofregularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction ofan official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Director