DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 
Docket No. 6906-16 
AUG 24 2017 

Dear 

This is in reference to your application for correction ofyour naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U.S.C. 1552. 

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 May 2017. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, yo ur naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The advisory opinion provided in HQMC memo l070 MIQ dated 10 January 2017 was sent to you on 27 March 2017 for an opportunity to comment prior to being considered by the Board. After the 30 day period for comment expired without a response, the case was presented to the Board. 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. The Board noted that the page 11 counseling entry was written in accordance with MCO P1070.12K and the Board considered your written rebuttal to the page 11 counseling. Your contention is that the page 11 counseling entry given is unwarranted because you deny ever conducting personal business on government time and property. The Board could not find any evidence that supports your claim. Accordingly, your application has been denied. 

It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. 

Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 

Executive Director