DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 8279-16 DEC 07 2017 Dear This is in reference to your applfoation for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions oftitle 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 September 2017. The names and votes of the members ofthe panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 14 August 2008. The Board noted that you re-enlisted in the Navy on 17 July 2013. As a result of not being able to meet physical standards, you were discharged with an Honorable characterization ofservice and were issued a separation code ofJFT ("Physical Standards") and the appropriate reentry code ofRE-3F, which means "Ineligible to reenlist without a NA VCRUITCOM waiver". After careful and conscientious consideration ofthe entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. The Board, in its review of your record, and application with supporting documentation, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your desire to upgrade your reenlistment code and your contention that yoµ believe that the reentry code issued should have been an RE-3T. The Board concluded there was no error or injustice in your record. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The RE-3F reenlistment code may not prohibit reenlistment, but requires that a waiver be obtained. Recruiting personnel are responsible for determining whether you meet the standards for reenlistment, and whether or not a request for a waiver ofyour reenlistment code is feasible. It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption ofregularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction ofan official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Director