DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 2034-17 From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF FORMER Ref: (a) 10U.S.C.§1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) ltr of20 Feb 17 1. Pursuant to the provisions ofreference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member ofthe Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting his reentry code be changed from "RE-4" to a reentry code that would allow him to reenlist in the Navy Reserve. Enclosures (1) and (2) apply. 2. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 June 2017 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, relevant portions of his naval records and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice finds as follows: a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy. b. Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 17 August 1998. On 29 September 1998, Petitioner failed a physical training run and was later diagnosed with a medial meniscus tear. As a result, administrative separation was initiated due to defective enlistment and induction into the naval service due to erroneous enlistment as evidenced by the torn cartilage in Petitioner's knee. On 23 October 1998, Petitioner was discharged with an uncharacterized characterization of service due to failed medical/physical procurement standards. He was assigned a Separation Program Designator (SPD) of "JFW and an RE-4 (ineligible for reenlistment) reentry code. At the time of his discharge, RE-3Q, RE-4 or RE-8 were the only authorized reentry codes when a JFW SPD was assigned. c. On 20 February 20 17, , APRN, FNP-C at examined Petitioner and determined Petitioner was a "healthy male." Enclosure (2) applies. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration ofall the evidence ofrecord, the Board concluded Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. The Board concluded Petitioner's assignment of an RE-4, although not in error when discharged, is now unjust based on his current health and, as such, the assigned RE-4 reentry code should be changed to an RE-8 (Temporary medical conditions or unsatisfactory initial performance and conduct). RECOMMEDATION In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an error warranting the following corrective action. The Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active duty (DD Form 2 l 4), executed on or about 23 October 1998 is modified to read block 27 (Reentry code) "RE-8" vice "RE-4". A copy of this report ofproceedings be filed in Petitioner's naval record. Upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be informed that Petitioner's application was received by the Board on 2 March 2017. 4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's revieTand deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe Board's procedings in the above entitled matter. 5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out n ec e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy. Executive Director