DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD. SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON. VA 22204-2490 

Docket No: 2173-17 
JAN 09 2018 

Dear : 

This is in reference to your application for correction ofyour naval record pursuant to the 
provisions ofTitle 10, United States Code, Section 1552. 

A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, 
considered your application on 2 November 2017. The names and votes ofthe members ofthe 
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in 
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis 
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together 
with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions ofyour naval record and 
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

After careful and conscientious consideration ofthe entire record, the Board found the evidence 
submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice to 
warrant removal ofthe document titled "DISENROLLMENT FROM THE MARINE CORPS ENLISTED COMMISSIONING EDUCATION PROGRAM (MECEP)". 

The Board considered your contentions that the comments contained in the document are adverse 
and do not accurately reflect a picture ofyour ability to serve in the future as a commissioned 
officer. The Board also considered your contentions that you were not provided an opportunity 
to rebut the letter which has become a permanent mark on your record which consists of 17 years 
of faithful service. The Board finds no material error or injustice warranting removal ofthe 
letter which documents your removal from MECEP in accordance with the referenced 
instructions. Accordingly, your application has been denied. 

It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken 
at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of 
new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. 
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption ofregularity attaches to all 
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction ofan official naval record, the 
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 


Executive Director