DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 

DocketNo: 2721-17 
JAN 10 2018 

From: Chairman, Board for Correction ofNaval Records 
To: Secretary of the Navy 

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO 

Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. §1552 
(b) MCO P1070.12K 
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments 

1. Pursuant to the provisions ofreference (a), Petitioner, , filed 
enclosure (I) with this Board requesting removal of two Administrative Remarks Page 11 entries 
dated and from his Official Military Pers onnel File (OMPF). 

2. The Board, consisting of             reviewed Petitioner's 
allegations oferror and injustice on 16 November 2017 and, pursuant to its regulations, 
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence 
ofrecord. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofthe epclosures, relevant 
portions ofPetitioner's naval records and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. 

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts ofrecord pertaining to Petitioner's allegations of 
error and injustice finds as follows: 

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available 
under existing law and regulations within the Department ofthe Navy. 

b. Petitioner's OMPF contains a 6105 Page 11 counseling entry dated 
Petitioner was eligible but not recommended for promotion to 
stating for the promotion period due to recent counseling statements. The entry is not signed but instead is 
marked "SNM unavailable for signature." Petitioner does not know where this Page 11 
originated because Petitioner did not receive a non-recommendation during that timeframe. 

c. Petitioner's OMPF contains a Page 11 entry dated was eligible but not recommended for promotion to 
stating Petitioner for the promotion period. The Page 11 also lists an EDIPI that does not belong to Petitioner. Additionally, the 
Page 11 entry is not signed but instead is marked "SNM not available for signature." 

d. Reference (b) requires the Marine receiving the Page 11 to acknowledge the entry by 
signing the entry. 

CONCLUSION 

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence ofrecord, the Board concludes that 
Petitioner's request warrants favorable action. 

The Board concluded it is error for the two Page 11 counseling entries, which were not 
acknowledged by Petitioner and which do not appear to pertain to Petitioner, to remain in 
Petitioner's OMPF. 

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of error warranting the following 
corrective action. 

RECOMMENDATION 

Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the Administrative Remarks Page 11 entries 
dated and 6105 from Petitioner's OMPF. 

4. It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the 
foregoing is a true and complete record ofthe Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter. 

5. Pursuant to the delegation ofauthority set out in Section 6(e) ofthe revised Procedures ofthe· 
Board for Correction ofNaval Records (32 Code ofFederal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and 
having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing 
corrective action, taken under the authority ofreference (a), has been approved by the Board on 
behalf ofthe Secretary ofthe Navy. 


Executive Director