DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No. 3498-17 FEB 25 2019 Dear , This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 United States Code §1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your case on its merits. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 September 2018. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion contained in HQMC memo 7220 MPO of 20 August 2018; a copy of which was previously provided to you for comment. A copy of this advisory opinion is again enclosed. You requested approval to transfer your Montgomery GI Bill education benefits to your dependent son. Your application states, "I was unable to transfer my MGIB educational benefits to my dependent son due to my inability to reenlist. I was not selected on the FY14 Staff Sergeant retention board resulting in being twice passed for promotion and an involuntary Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA)." The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, to include your assertions. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that Marine Corps guidance implementing the transfer of Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits was published by Marine Corps Administration (MARADMIN) message 0389/09, released on 29 June 2009 and MARADMIN 0421/09, released on 15 July 2009. Specifically, these MARADMIN messages outlined eligibility, processing, service obligation, and reference information germane to transferring education benefits to eligible dependents. The Board found that being twice passed over for promotion as a Staff Sergeant did not prevent you from obligating to 20 years of active military service, nor transferring your Post9/11 GI Bill benefits prior to your retiring. The Board concurred with the advisory opinion that you had the opportunity from 1 August 2009 through your retirement of 31 May 2015 to transfer your educational benefits. Furthermore, the Board found that you voluntarily requested to be retired under TERA, thereby making you ineligible to transfer your educational benefits to your dependent son. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Director