DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY 

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 

Docket No: 7410-17 
DEC 26 2017 

Dear : 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the 
provisions oftitle 1O of the United States Code, section 1552. 

A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, 
considered your application on 22 November 2017. The names and votes of the members ofthe 
panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in 
accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis 
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together 
with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions ofyour naval record, and 
applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The advisory opinion (AO) provided in 
Headquarters, Marine Corps Memorandum 1610 MMRP-13/PERB dated was 
sent to you on for an opportunity to comment prior to being considered by the 
Board. After the 30 day period for comment expired without a response, the case was presented 
to the Board. 

The Board carefully considered your desire to remove your fitness report (FITREP) for the 
reporting period to (OMPF). The Board considered your contention that your height and weight was properly 
from your Official Military Personnel File measured at your parent command, both prior to departing and upon return from your temporary 
assigned duty (TAD) and you were found to be within standards. The Board significantly 
concurred with the AO and concluded that you did not sufficiently substantiate the existence of 
an error or injustice. The Board determined that the removal ofthe FITREP is not warranted. 
Accordingly, your application has been denied. 

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken 
at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of 
new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. 

In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all 
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the 
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 


Executive Director