DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No.7531-17 MAR 20 2018 Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions ofTitle 10 U.S.C. § 1552. A three-member panel ofthe Board for Correction ofNaval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 2018. The names and votes ofthe members ofthe panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations oferror and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings ofthis Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ofyour application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions ofyour naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration ofthe entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board concluded Navy Transferability policies were promulgated on three occasions prior to your 2 February 2011 discharge. Specifically, Navy Administrative (NAV AD MIN) message 187/09, NAVADMIN 203/09 and Bureau ofNaval Personnel Notice 1780 (dated 7 April 2010) outlined eligibility, processing, service obligation, and reference infonnation germane to transferring education benefits to eligible dependents prior to separating from the Navy. Accordingly, your application has been denied. It is regretted that the circumstances ofyour case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption ofregularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence ofprobable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Director