DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 8541-17 MAY O3 2019 Dear : This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2019. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 10 November 1983. After nearly two years and six months, you were the subject of a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) that diagnosed you with an atypical psychosis a conditions that did not exist prior to enlistment and alcohol abuse that existed prior to enlistment. The diagnosed conditions interfered with your potential for performance of expected duties and responsibilities. Subsequently, you were involuntarily processed for separation by reason of physical disability. In connection with this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation action and the separation authority approved and directed your separation. You were authorized disability severance pay. On 30 September 1986, you were discharged with an honorable characterization of service by reason physical disability and assigned an RE-3P reentry code. The Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your contention that you have never had any psychological issues. The Board noted that you provided no evidence to support your contention. However, the Board noted that your record contains documented evidence which is contrary to your contention and concluded that you were found unfit for duty based on your physical disability. Furthermore, the Board in its review discerned no impropriety or inequity in the discharge. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken at this time. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon the submission of new and material evidence. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, Executive Director