DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 Docket No: 8908-17 Ref: Signature date Dear This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, your application has been denied. Although your application was not filed in a timely manner, the Board found it in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and consider your application on its merits. A three- member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 January 2019. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, relevant portions of your naval record, as well as applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on 26 May 1999. Following your . On 20 July 2000, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for two separate incidents of unauthorized absence of 3 days and 16 days, respectively, and for wrongful use of marijuana. The same day you were notified of administrative separation proceedings against you on the basis of misconduct due to drug abuse. You waived your right to appear before an administrative separation board. On 24 July 2000, Commanding Officer, recommending that you be separated on the basis of misconduct; you waived your right to appear before an administrative separation board. You were discharged from the Marine Corps on 28 August 2000, on the basis of misconduct and received an other than honorable characterization of service and a reentry (RE) code of RE-4. In your petition to the Board, you request an upgrade to your discharge characterization from other than honorable to honorable, a change to your narrative reason for separation, a change to your separation code, and a change from RE-4 to RE-1. You state that since your discharge you have become a successful member of society. You note holding supervisory roles in your professional life, cite your academic successes, and provide character letters in support of your application. The Board carefully reviewed your application and the accompanying brief you submitted in support of your request for correction to your record. The Board took into consideration the amount of time that has passed since your discharge and noted your post-service accomplishments. The Board also noted your claim of material injustice, and reviewed your assertion that you have dedicated yourself to bettering yourself through vocation, academics, and giving to your community. Even in consideration of your post-service achievements, the Board found that the seriousness of your misconduct of two instances of UA and your wrongful use of a controlled substance while in an active duty status warranted your other than honorable discharge characterization and the RE-4. Furthermore, the Board found that the NJP findings supported your current separation narrative. The Board concluded that your record does not reflect an error or an injustice, that your post-service accomplishments do not overcome the seriousness of your in-service misconduct, and the information reflected on your Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214) is supported by your actions while on active duty. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new matters. New matters are those not previously presented to or considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, 5/14/2019